Re: Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

/dev/rob0 wrote: > > (See also RFC 2317 for "classless" reverse DNS delegation, but no, > DO NOT read that: I only mention it for completeness, as we have > pedantic posters on this list ... myself included. ;) ) Yeah, try https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2317bis

Re: Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Lyle wrote: ... > As far as question 2, depends on if the reverse zones were delegated to > you or not. It depends on your ISP. Many do not delegate reverse lookup > zones to the end user. In that case, you have to ask them to insert the >

Re: Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

. Two questions: 1. Where is the doc that completely describes the allowable reverse mapping zone file names? 2. When running my own authoritative name servers, do I need reverse mapping for anything other than my single mail server? Thanks. Best regards, -Tom

Re: Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

On Saturday, August 27, 2016, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:47:36AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > I do not control 3-octet networks but need reverse mapping for my > > mail server. > > Discuss that with your ISP or netblock owner. ... Thanks for the good advice,

Re: Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:47:36AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > I do not control 3-octet networks but need reverse mapping for my > mail server. Discuss that with your ISP or netblock owner. > Two questions: > > 1. Where is the doc that completely describes the allowable reverse

Allowable reverse mapping zone file names

I do not control 3-octet networks but need reverse mapping for my mail server. Two questions: 1. Where is the doc that completely describes the allowable reverse mapping zone file names? 2. When running my own authoritative name servers, do I need reverse mapping for anything other than my