Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:31:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are using Solaris SunOS 5.9 with BIND 9.3.2-P2 that is running properly. > When we tried to install the other versions of BIND such BIND 9.5.0-P2 and > BIND 9.4.2-P1, we faced a lot of resolving problems with "Ser

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
om: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:27 PM To: Daniel Dawalibi Cc: 'Thomas Schulz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > T

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of > bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue. Please be more specific. Exactly which "another version" did you try? Wh

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Segner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you set the max-cache-size variable to a reasonable value other than the default 32MB? If you can stand to use a version of bind officially list

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Segner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you set the max-cache-size variable to a reasonable value other than the >default 32MB? If you can stand to use a version of bind officially listed as beta, you might try 9.5.1b3. It fixes a bug in the cache cleani