Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jul 25, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Peter Laws wrote: > On 07/23/11 22:08, Karl Auer wrote: > > >> Maybe this is an overly naive approach, but can't you set up one zone >> for 10.0.0.0/8 and delegate as necessary from that single zone file? >> Anything that you don't have an answer for will get NXDOMA

Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-26 Thread Mark Andrews
Just delegate the /16's that make up the /10's. I don't understand why people want to make this more complicated than it needs to be. Similarly of /17-/23 you just delegate the /24's. Using CNAMES only make sense for /25-/32. Mark In message <4e2de5f0.9050...@ou.edu>, Peter Laws writes: > On 0

Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-25 Thread Peter Laws
On 07/23/11 22:08, Karl Auer wrote: Maybe this is an overly naive approach, but can't you set up one zone for 10.0.0.0/8 and delegate as necessary from that single zone file? Anything that you don't have an answer for will get NXDOMAIN, which is presumably what you want. So: zone "10.IN

Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-24 Thread Grant Taylor
On 7/23/2011 20:01, Laws, Peter C. wrote: We use 10/8 space extensively over multiple campuses. We need to delegate at the 10/ essentially, the 10/16 level. Is there a better way to do it than ... et cetera, ad nauseum and then putting in NS records as necessary? Maybe. (This is completely u

Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-23 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Laws, Peter C. wrote: > Decloaking to ask for pointers to some help regarding RFC 1918 zone > delegation. > > We use 10/8 space extensively over multiple campuses.  We need to delegate at > the 10/ essentially, the 10/16 level.  Is there a better way to do it tha

Re: Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-23 Thread Karl Auer
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 01:01 +, Laws, Peter C. wrote: > Decloaking to ask for pointers to some help regarding RFC 1918 zone > delegation. > > We use 10/8 space extensively over multiple campuses. We need to > delegate at the 10/ essentially, the 10/16 level. Is there a better > way to do it

Breaking up RFC 1918 reverse space

2011-07-23 Thread Laws, Peter C.
Decloaking to ask for pointers to some help regarding RFC 1918 zone delegation. We use 10/8 space extensively over multiple campuses. We need to delegate at the 10/ essentially, the 10/16 level. Is there a better way to do it than zone "0.10.IN-ADDR.ARPA" { type master; fil