Re: Reverse dns issue

2011-03-23 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4d8a0386.3080...@laas.fr>, Olivier Destras writes: > Hi, > > I'm using a software which uses bind and I'm experiencing a problem with > the reverse dns function of bind. > I only have private adresses on my network but the nodes also have dns > names. There is a server on this netwo

Reverse dns issue

2011-03-23 Thread Olivier Destras
Hi, I'm using a software which uses bind and I'm experiencing a problem with the reverse dns function of bind. I only have private adresses on my network but the nodes also have dns names. There is a server on this network, which is also a name server, that has internet through a gateway. When

Re: DNS issue

2010-08-30 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 8/29/2010 5:22 AM, Agarwal Vivek-RNGB36 wrote: Hi All I am using ISC-BIND 9.3.4 as a DNS Server. Im facing an issue that Im getting lot of Queries as like: type NS, class IN. This is leading to high CPU Utilization of my system. Can anyone help me that how can I solve this issue and why these

Re: DNS issue

2010-08-30 Thread Kebba Foon
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 10:22 +0100, Agarwal Vivek-RNGB36 wrote: > Hi All > > I am using ISC-BIND 9.3.4 as a DNS Server. Im facing an issue that Im > getting lot of Queries as like : type NS, class IN. This is > leading to high CPU Utilization of my system. Can anyone help me that > how can I solve

DNS issue

2010-08-29 Thread Agarwal Vivek-RNGB36
Hi All I am using ISC-BIND 9.3.4 as a DNS Server. Im facing an issue that Im getting lot of Queries as like : type NS, class IN. This is leading to high CPU Utilization of my system. Can anyone help me that how can I solve this issue and why these requests will be coming Regards Vivek Aggarwal

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:31:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are using Solaris SunOS 5.9 with BIND 9.3.2-P2 that is running properly. > When we tried to install the other versions of BIND such BIND 9.5.0-P2 and > BIND 9.4.2-P1, we faced a lot of resolving problems with "Ser

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
om: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:27 PM To: Daniel Dawalibi Cc: 'Thomas Schulz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > T

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of > bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue. Please be more specific. Exactly which "another version" did you try? Wh

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Segner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you set the max-cache-size variable to a reasonable value other than the default 32MB? If you can stand to use a version of bind officially list

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Segner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you set the max-cache-size variable to a reasonable value other than the >default 32MB? If you can stand to use a version of bind officially listed as beta, you might try 9.5.1b3. It fixes a bug in the cache cleani