IPv6 prefixes in ACLs

2013-02-16 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for the nets I am currently using? Does it make any difference for performance? Any other concerns? The 192.168 nets I use I have a /24 specified though typically I am only using the lower /26. In theory, no one out there c

Re: IPv6 prefixes in ACLs

2013-02-17 Thread Evan Hunt
> Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for > the nets I am currently using? Both ways work. > Does it make any difference for performance? Possibly, but I doubt you could measure it. (Unless you're using a really ancent version of BIND, in which case the shorter l

Re: IPv6 prefixes in ACLs

2013-02-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/17/2013 12:43 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: Should I put a single entry for my /48 allocation or 16 /64 entries for the nets I am currently using? Both ways work. Does it make any difference for performance? Possibly, but I doubt you could measure it. (Unless you're using a really ancent versio