> On Sep 27, 2022, at 02:50, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>
> On Sat 24/Sep/2022 01:10:12 +0200 Dan Mahoney wrote:
>>> On Aug 23, 2022, at 07:39, G.W. Haywood via bind-users
>>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I see the list operates both From: mungin
Hi Dan,
On Sat 24/Sep/2022 01:10:12 +0200 Dan Mahoney wrote:
On Aug 23, 2022, at 07:39, G.W. Haywood via bind-users
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm clear
about the former, I'm curious about how ARC
On Sat 24/Sep/2022 00:23:03 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
another test done
Thanks for reporting.
This is slightly OT, as it concerns the list functioning rather than DNS. I
hope it doesn't afflict...
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm
clear about
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 07:39, G.W. Haywood via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
>> I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm clear
>> about the former, I'm curious about how ARC works:
>> Do any subscribers tru
another test done
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC
sealing. While I'm clear about the former, I'm curious
about how ARC works:
Do any subscribers trust the seal by isc.org?
I guess most of recipients use predefined configurations, e.g. no whitelisting.
out of curiousity,
On Sun 04/Sep/2022 14:17:25 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.pao1.isc.org;
dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=tana.it;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tana.it;
dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.i=@tana.it
That stanza is faulty. The key at eps
Alessandro Vesely skrev den 2022-09-04 12:56:
Mailman options[†] don't include something like
*From munging*:
Set this option to /Disabled/ to receive messages with the original
From:
line intact. Keep in mind that disabling this option will fail
DMARC, so
keep it enabled unless
On Fri 02/Sep/2022 14:27:55 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.08.22 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm
clear about the former, I'm curious about how ARC works:
Do any subscribers trust the seal by isc.org?
I guess mos
On 25.08.22 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The lack of interest by others proves that From: munging is not so
much of a nuisance as they say...
On Mon 29/Aug/2022 12:09:10 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This will come sooner or later, however:
earlier this year I've done small dmarc re
On Mon 29/Aug/2022 12:09:10 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.08.22 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The lack of interest by others proves that From: munging is not so much of a
nuisance as they say...
This will come sooner or later, however:
earlier this year I've done small dmarc r
On 25.08.22 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Thanks Ged for all the feedback.
The lack of interest by others proves that From: munging is not so
much of a nuisance as they say...
This will come sooner or later, however:
earlier this year I've done small dmarc research for our client:
- micro
Thanks Ged for all the feedback.
The lack of interest by others proves that From: munging is not so much of
a nuisance as they say...
Best
Ale
On Tue 23/Aug/2022 16:39:33 +0200 Bind Users wrote:
Hi there,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I see the list operates both From: m
Hi there,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm
clear about the former, I'm curious about how ARC works:
Do any subscribers trust the seal by isc.org?
When it comes to email, I don't trust *anything*. :)
General
Hi all and list admins,
I see the list operates both From: munging and ARC sealing. While I'm
clear about the former, I'm curious about how ARC works:
Do any subscribers trust the seal by isc.org?
In that case, do they get non-munged messages?
Are there other advantages that ARC brings abou
14 matches
Mail list logo