> On 4 Jun 2018, at 10:21, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 06:00:08AM +, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> The PKCS#11 interface is very fragile, as the different vendors implement
>> different parts of the
>> standard, and BIND needs to be compiled with a specific PKCS#11 provider
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 06:00:08AM +, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> The PKCS#11 interface is very fragile, as the different vendors implement
> different parts of the
> standard, and BIND needs to be compiled with a specific PKCS#11 provider
> defined at the
> compile time. This is certainly
On 03-Jun-18 02:00, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BIND 9 currently supports two major cryptography provider libraries -
> OpenSSL[1] and PKCS#11.
>
> The PKCS#11 interface is very fragile, as the different vendors implement
> different parts of the
> standard, and BIND needs to be compiled
Hi all,
BIND 9 currently supports two major cryptography provider libraries -
OpenSSL[1] and PKCS#11.
The PKCS#11 interface is very fragile, as the different vendors implement
different parts of the
standard, and BIND needs to be compiled with a specific PKCS#11 provider
defined at the
4 matches
Mail list logo
