Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Hi Fajar, OK sounds familiar to me ;-) OK let me try your proposal and install libssl1.0-dev and see if I can get bind-9.11.0-P2 to build. Many thanks, Wolfgang > On 27 Jan 2017, at 14:40PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Wolfgang Riedel

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

> Just wonder if there is some agreed guidance on what steps I SHOULD take = > to get bind-9.11.0-P2 successfully build on Debian 9.0? > > > /usr/bin/ld: //lib64/libcrypto.a(a_object.o): > relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `ASN1_OBJECT_free' > can not be used when making a shared object; >

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Wolfgang Riedel wrote: > Just wonder if there is some agreed guidance on what steps I SHOULD take > to get bind-9.11.0-P2 successfully build on Debian 9.0? > > The generic recommendation on debian would probably be 'use whatever the distro comes with, as they main

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Hi Folks, many thanks for the candidate feedback and the deep dive on what I should not have done ;-) Not a big deal as it’s just a VM and I can easily start from scratch but I am burning a lot of time trying instead of learning. Just wonder if there is some agreed guidance on what steps I SHOU

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Am 26.01.2017 um 19:50 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea] (My text in brackets) Said no one, ever. That wasn't the point however. The point is that the sources do exist fo

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Am 26.01.2017 um 19:55 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 01/26/2017 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: libraries got overwritten by the package manager Impossible. If the user built or the vendor supplied software follows the rules of separation along with the RPATH and RUNPATH data inside the ELF

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 1/26/17 1:50 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: >> On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >>> The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea] >> >> (My text in brackets) >> >> Said no one, ever. > >Clearly I just said it ... and have before ... as have othe

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 01/26/2017 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: librarie sgot overwritten by the package manager Impossible. If the user built or the vendor supplied software follows the rules of separation along with the RPATH and RUNPATH data inside the ELF dynamic sections then what you say is impossi

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea] (My text in brackets) Said no one, ever. Clearly I just said it ... and have before ... as have others for about twenty years or at least since 1999. Essential

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Am 26.01.2017 um 19:31 schrieb Dennis Clarke: 1) OpenSSL dependency dance I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and related packages, rather than installing it yourself. Plain libssl-dev in Stretch is

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea] (My text in brackets) Said no one, ever. AlanC signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

1) OpenSSL dependency dance I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and related packages, rather than installing it yourself. Plain libssl-dev in Stretch is OpenSSL 1.1. If you install stuff yourself f

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Am 26.01.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Dennis Clarke: OpenSSL 1.1 is currently not supported because they made backwards-incompatible API changes ... Is this issue documented somewhere? it was discussed multiple times here https://www.google.com/search?q=bind+openssl+1.1 when you follow several d

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

OpenSSL 1.1 is currently not supported because they made > backwards-incompatible API changes ... Is this issue documented somewhere ? Dennis Clarke ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this li

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

ompiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)? I haven't tried it myself. 1) OpenSSL dependency dance I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and related packages, rather than instal

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

n 2017, at 16:22PM, Tony Finch wrote: > > Wolfgang Riedel wrote: >> >> Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 >> (stretch)? > > I haven't tried it myself. > >> 1) OpenSSL dependency dance >> >>

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Wolfgang Riedel wrote: > > Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 > (stretch)? I haven't tried it myself. > 1) OpenSSL dependency dance > > I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source You'll probably have bet

bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

Hi Folks,Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)?1) OpenSSL dependency danceI removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from sourceopenssl versionOpenSSL 1.0.2e 3 Dec 20152) configure./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr