Dear All,
In my environment we have internal DNS servers and 6 external server all
running BIND.
4 of these 6 are located in our network. These are slaves for our domain and
fetching the data from one internal server.
And the remaining 2 are maintained by our ISP and doing a zone transfer fro
On 6 July 2017 at 12:29, MAYER Hans wrote:
> For me this looks like a bug. Why is the answer for a normal query different
> than the answer from a zone transfer ?
> Or do I miss a special flag for this setup ?
> I am using BIND 9.11.1 but I had the same issue with older
> versions too.
A zone
Hi Steven,
Many thanks for your answer.
Isn’t there a flag or option to say handle all sub-zones like normal A or CNAME
records too ?
// Hans
> On 6 Jul 2017, at 15:05, Steven Carr wrote:
>
> On 6 July 2017 at 12:29, MAYER Hans wrote:
>> For me this looks like a bug. Why is the answer
On 9 July 2017 at 06:14, MAYER Hans wrote:
> Many thanks for your answer.
> Isn’t there a flag or option to say handle all sub-zones like normal A or
> CNAME records too ?
Not that I'm aware of. You might want to look at DNS Views to present
different responses instead of overriding with a subzo
Behalf Of MAYER
Hans
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2017 1:14 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: different result between normal query and zone transfer
Hi Steven,
Many thanks for your answer.
Isn’t there a flag or option to say handle all sub-zones like normal A or CNAME
records too ?
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
> There is no "automatic" mechanism within BIND to tell replicas to start
> slaving new zones.
Fans of new features pop up in response to say, you might be able to use
catalog zones to automatically configure replication :-)
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01401/0/A-short
Am 10.07.2017 um 18:48 schrieb Tony Finch:
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
There is no "automatic" mechanism within BIND to tell replicas to start
slaving new zones.
Fans of new features pop up in response to say, you might be able to use
catalog zones to automatically configure replication :-)
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> well, bind10 is dead so far and at least no longer a ISC project
Catalog zones are a BIND 9.11 feature.
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01432/81/BIND-9.11.0-Release-Notes.html#relnotes_features
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Forth,
8 matches
Mail list logo