I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3 server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open and
write any of the zone files it downloaded.
named -c /etc/named.conf (yes I am running this a root)
The error is
Sep 9 10:40:05 linuxps named[3054
Does name own the directory?
Quoting Lyle Giese :
I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3 server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open and
write any of the zone files it downloaded.
named -c /etc/named.conf (yes I am running this a roo
Lyle Giese wrote:
I am not running named as named, but as root(no -u on command line).
But in testng I did change the permissions on this directory to 777
with no change in behaviour and changed it back to 755.
Lyle Giese
LCR Computer Services, Inc.
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3 server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open and write
any of the zone files it downloaded.
named -c /etc/named.conf (yes I am running this a root)
I had
David Forrest wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3
server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open
and write any of the zone files it downloaded.
named -c /etc/named.conf (yes I am runnin
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
David Forrest wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3 server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open and
write any of the zone files it downloaded.
name
David Forrest wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
David Forrest wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am trying to install bind 9.7.1-P2 from source on a SLES 10 SP3
server.
When I run named from the command line, it runs, but fails to open
and write any of the zone file
I'm not any sort of Linux expert but this started my mind thinking.
Take a look at the BIND FAQ, it comes with the sources. There are some Linux
specific comments about file and directory permissions. Bind running under
Linux drops special 'root' permissions when it starts up.
Also, there are s
wllarso wrote:
> I'm not any sort of Linux expert but this started my mind thinking.
>
> Take a look at the BIND FAQ, it comes with the sources. There are some
> Linux specific comments about file and directory permissions. Bind
> running under Linux drops special 'root' permissions when it starts
Many Linux boxes have additional security subsystems
added like SELinux and you need to comply with both
the filesystem and SELinux's configuration.
Also named drops root permissions. Both of these issues
are documented in the faq.
http://
On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
> wllarso wrote:
>>
>> I'm not any sort of Linux expert but this started my mind thinking.
>>
>> Take a look at the BIND FAQ, it comes with the sources. There are some Linux
>> specific comments about file and directory permissions. Bind running und
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
>
>
>> wllarso wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not any sort of Linux expert but this started my mind thinking.
>>>
>>> Take a look at the BIND FAQ, it comes with the sources. There are some
>>> Linux specific comments about file and dir
12 matches
Mail list logo
