Hello Bioconductors,
We're pleased to announce a new shield to join the ones we rolled out in May.
The new shield measures test coverage of a package, as determined by Jim
Hester's covr package.
Coverage is a measure of the degree to which package code is tested by your
unit tests
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org wrote:
Hello Bioconductors,
We're pleased to announce a new shield to join the ones we rolled out in May.
The new shield measures test coverage of a package, as determined by Jim
Hester's covr package.
Coverage is a
On 06/24/2015 10:42 AM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
In order for R to find those symbols reliably, you need to import
those functions into your NAMESPACE, and therefore you should ensure
yes
that the Biobase package is listed on the Depends line of your
DESCRIPTION. Your package directly depends
I'm surely not the first asking this question.
But as I did not find a clear answer to that (e.g. in the 'Writing R
extensions' manual or in the diverse posts on this), I risk asking it
again.
As an example:
I'm dealing a lot with ExpressionSets (from Biobase) and
GeneSet[Collection]s (from
In order for R to find those symbols reliably, you need to import
those functions into your NAMESPACE, and therefore you should ensure
that the Biobase package is listed on the Depends line of your
DESCRIPTION. Your package directly depends on Biobase, so there's no
redundancy by having it listed
