Hi All
Is it acceptable to specify a particular version of igraph for our package to
use, even as a temporary fix?
Failing that, does anyone know of any way I can get R to tell me which
functions in our package (CausalR) call which igraph functions?
Thanks
Glyn
-Original Message-
Also just found https://github.com/mllg/checkmate
Haven't used it before but it seems well thought out, also impressive test
coverage! (not biased).
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Valerie Obenchain voben...@fredhutch.org
wrote:
There is a collection in S4Vectors that test atomic types and
There is a collection in S4Vectors that test atomic types and return a
logical.
isSingleInteger
isSingleNumber
isSingleNumberOrNA
isSingleString
isSingleStringOrNA
isTRUEorFALSE
isSingleNumber(1:5)
[1] FALSE
isSingleNumber(NA)
[1] FALSE
Val
On 07/22/2015 04:22 PM, Jim Hester wrote:
Not
it's slightly annoying to write
foo - function(x) {
if ( ! is.numeric(x) ) stop(x should be numeric)
if ( ! length(x) == 2 ) stop(x should be length 2)
c(x[2], x[1])
}
i wonder if we could have some core functions that test the class and
the length in one and give the appropriate stop
Not sure about within Bioconductor but Hadley has a package to do this.
https://github.com/hadley/assertthat
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Michael Love michaelisaiahl...@gmail.com
wrote:
it's slightly annoying to write
foo - function(x) {
if ( ! is.numeric(x) ) stop(x should be
- Original Message -
From: Glyn Bradley glyn.x.brad...@gsk.com
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:59:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] changes to igraph break many Bioconductor packages
(in release and devel)
Hi All
Is it acceptable to specify a
