Dear Hervé,
Thank you very much for your answer. Regarding the issue that my package
encounters during the building on SPB i had the same doubt. Indeed when i
include that variable locally in my Renviron file everything works as
expected (tests that should be skipped on Bioconductor are indeed
Hi Jacopo,
testthat::skip_on_bioc() relies on the IS_BIOC_BUILD_MACHINE environment
variable to know whether it's on a BioC build machine or not.
This environment variable is defined during the daily build via the
Renviron.bioc file. Note that a link to this file is provided on the
individual
FWIW I've documented the process of making a TxDb object for
T2T-CHM13v2.0 there:
https://github.com/Bioconductor/GenomicFeatures/issues/65
Please comment there for any follow-up.
Note that we're considering wrapping this is an TxDb package that we'll
make available to the community. It's a
Hi Christian,
This conversation is off-topic, both for this listserv (it’s meant to help
people developing Bioconductor packages) and for the support site (which is
meant to help people with (again), Bioconductor packages. I’ll answer your
questions one more time, but if you have other
Dear Developers,
I am currently in the process of submitting my package on Bioconductor and
I am facing some issues during the R CMD check on the Bioconductor Build
System. Since I was not able to find any answers to my doubts, I decided to
ask for your help before doing anything wrong.
The
Dear Vincent and others,
thanks for the reply! Irrespective of whether a different OrgDb is
required, the name itself suggested that there "should be" also
corresponding OrgDb and TxDb packages. I can build one on my own, I see,
is there anyone who works on providing the TxDB object for Bioc?
I
