function()
+{
+eh <- get_ExperimentHub()
+eh[["EH5373"]]
+}
Sorry again if I have misinterpreted your approach.
Kind regards,
Alan.
----
*From:* Hervé Pagès
*Sent:* 23 March 2021 19:08
*To:* Murphy, Alan E ; Martin Morgan
; Kern, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Kind regards,
Alan.
From: Herv� Pag�s
Sent: 23 March 2021 19:08
To: Murphy, Alan E ; Martin Morgan
; Kern, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
Doesn't really matter where you put them but
.my_intern
---
*From:* Hervé Pagès
*Sent:* 23 March 2021 17:31
*To:* Murphy, Alan E ; Martin Morgan
; Kern, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
3 ways to do this, one that doesn't work, and two that work ;-)
1. Simple wa
_
From: Herv� Pag�s
Sent: 23 March 2021 17:31
To: Murphy, Alan E ; Martin Morgan
; Kern, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
3 ways to do this, one that doesn't work, and two that work ;-)
1. Simple way that doesn't work:
-
*From:* Hervé Pagès
*Sent:* 23 March 2021 16:46
*To:* Murphy, Alan E ; Martin Morgan
; Kern, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
***
This email originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and
attachments unle
l@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
***
This email originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and
attachments unless you recognise the sender.
If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list
https://spam.ic.ac
an.
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: 22 March 2021 18:17
To: Kern, Lori ; Murphy, Alan E <
a.mur...@imperial.ac.uk>; bioc-devel@r-project.org <
bioc-devel@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
(sticking bioc-devel
On 3/23/21 4:11 AM, Murphy, Alan E wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much Martin and Hervé for your suggestions. I have reverted my zzz.R on load
function to that advised by ExperimentHub and had used the ID look up (system.time(tt_alzh
<- eh[["EH5373"]])) on internal functions and unit tests.
e or is this against best
> practice and should I look for improvements elsewhere? I ask because I feel
> I'm running out of easy options at reducing the overall runtime.
>
> Kind regards,
> Alan.
>
>
>
> From: Martin Morgan
> Sent: 22 Marc
__
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: 22 March 2021 18:17
To: Kern, Lori ; Murphy, Alan E
; bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
(sticking bioc-devel back in the recipient list so others can learn / improve /
disagree with this suggestion.)
my
Hi Alan,
It looks like what is slowing everything down significantly is the
approach you've taken to look up the ExperimentHub resources that you
control by name every time you need to access them. E.g:
Look up by name:
> system.time(tt_alzh <- ewceData::tt_alzh())
snapshotDate():
n behalf of Murphy,
Alan E
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 5:38 AM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
Hi all,
I am working on the development of
[EWCE](https://se
March 22, 2021 5:38 AM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Methods to speed up R CMD Check
Hi all,
I am working on the development of
[EWCE](https://secure-web.cisco.com/1uG0LGgCjdg85VowwaeRHk2fMjXFkOtQWsgL8p2MQD2j2PZFh_tqvJWaCHJfArA8O4B2WLG1JOwn31NISgSrPW3syUdiPlWNi7cHAMCWKZU
Hi all,
I am working on the development of [EWCE](https://github.com/NathanSkene/EWCE)
but have hit an issue with R CMD check's runtime. I have been informed this
test needs to be completed in 15 minutes but mine is currently running in ~24
minutes and I am looking for methods to speed this
14 matches
Mail list logo
