Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:37:50AM +0100, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: > Anyway, it seems to be stable now - let me know if you would like the tcpdump > anyway. No, it is not necessary. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-m

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
The Force10 manual states about peer-routing: VLT unicast routing locally routes packets destined for the L3 endpoint of the VLT peer. So if this means that if LSAs for router1 are sent down the link in the port channel connecting to router2, then router2 will respond instead of sending the tr

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
Hi, Thanks for your input - the Force10 switches have a VLT function (almost the same as cisco vPC) which makes it possible to run LACP against two non-stacked switches. But this VLT stuff is only for L2, not L3, which means that basically servers see the switches as one device through L2, but

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
It seems this is working if I disable the peer-routing feature on the Force10 routers - I’ll test a little more and get back with a tcpdump Thanks. On 13/12/2013, at 18.01.10, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:47:17PM +0100, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is this not

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Mikhail A. Grishin
Kveri wrote, 16.12.2013 13:49: Hello, you cannot use LACP between 3 devices. That is only possible if two of those devices (Force10 routers/switches) are forming one logical device (Cisco VSS, MEC, virtual PortChannel, HP IRF), I don't know if Force10 has something like that. It has: http://h

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Kveri
Hello, you cannot use LACP between 3 devices. That is only possible if two of those devices (Force10 routers/switches) are forming one logical device (Cisco VSS, MEC, virtual PortChannel, HP IRF), I don't know if Force10 has something like that. If you do this however, those 2 routers will ap

Re: Multiple OSPF adjacencies on same interface...

2013-12-16 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
Yes - the reason is that this router is a VM with two passthrough NICs. The hypervisor is connected to both Force10 routers/switches with LACP, so the VM needs to run linux bonding mode 2 to provide a bond0 interface to the VM. Neighbourship then needs to be established to both routers on this bon