Something else, in calc_next_hop:
don't you need to return all next hops for ptmp links now that you
support ECMP?
The same as in ptp or bcast - multiple next hops are created
by compositing returns of calc_next_hop(). Look at the caller
of calc_next_hop().
Don't think it
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
We have an old zebra based GMPLS TE (using RSVP too) to allocate
paths through our network. Don't
-Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote: -
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
We have an old zebra based GMPLS TE
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2011/01/01 10:51:03:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:17:24AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, good to hear.
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
We have an
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:17:24AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, good to hear.
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
BTW, I think the README could use an update:
This software should be considered a
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/28 10:00:03:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:12:53AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Right, some comments:
- px_pos* is redundant. Just use rt_pos* for both V4 and V6.
rt_pos* is a position in Router-LSA, px_pos* is a position in
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21:58PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I see. You took the concept one step further.
How does the lsa pos in add_network work for ac_stubnet_list?
Stubnet lists does not have en interface connected, perhaps ac_stubnet_list
isn't applicable for add_network?
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/30 01:55:34:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21:58PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I see. You took the concept one step further.
How does the lsa pos in add_network work for ac_stubnet_list?
Stubnet lists does not have en
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:12:53AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Right, some comments:
- px_pos* is redundant. Just use rt_pos* for both V4 and V6.
rt_pos* is a position in Router-LSA, px_pos* is a position in
Rt Prefix-LSA. In IPv6, we use both and they might be different.
- You can use
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/28 10:00:03:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:12:53AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Right, some comments:
- px_pos* is redundant. Just use rt_pos* for both V4 and V6.
rt_pos* is a position in Router-LSA, px_pos* is a position in
Rt
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if
they aren't addressed to AllSPFRouters.
I just noticed you impl. a PTMP I/F type, nice :)
I
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:06:17PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if
they aren't addressed
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:15:28AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if
they aren't
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/28 01:55:42:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:15:28AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 03:24:23:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:22:48AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
For PTP iface, the list contains at most one entry (so the scan is fast
:-) ) and you have to examine it anyways to know neighbor's IP address.
Yes, it
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 00:27:44:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Something like this. It is not tested at all and and very simple.
Here is version 2, even simpler :)
That is nice, makes several things simpler. I
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I don't remember all the details anymore but sharing IP address for numbered
ptp I/Fs is not pathological.
Having two independent networks with the same IP prefix seems pretty
pathological to me.
It should just work. Also any
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 00:22:26:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I don't remember all the details anymore but sharing IP address for numbered
ptp I/Fs is not pathological.
Having two independent networks with the same IP
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 00:27:44:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Something like this. It is not tested at all and and very simple.
Here is version 2, even simpler :)
That is nice, makes several things simpler. I
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25:49AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Perhaps you can add PTP IF type too?
PTP is supported, do you mean PTMP?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3,
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 00:40:50:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25:49AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Perhaps you can add PTP IF type too?
PTP is supported, do you mean PTMP?
I meant a #define OSPF_IT_MPTP xx so one knows
if it is a ptmp and ptp link. For ptp
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/21 00:59:18:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:36:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Question:
in calc_next_hop() does this* match
16.1.1 para 5. ...the parent vertex is a network that
directly connects the calculating router to the
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:22:48AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
For PTP iface, the list contains at most one entry (so the scan is fast
:-) ) and you have to examine it anyways to know neighbor's IP address.
Yes, it is a small improvement I guess and you would find the remote
IP address,
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/17 00:50:41:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:41:24PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This will find any ptp link that matches and several of them will match.
Not really. For unnumbered ptp links (where sharing of IP addresses
between several
/12/17 12:11
Subject: Re: ECMP/multipath support
Sent by: owner-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/12/17 00:50:41:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:41:24PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This will find any ptp link that matches
[mailto:owner-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz] On Behalf Of Andrew Lemin
Sent: 13 November 2010 20:22
To: Ondrej Zajicek
Cc: Vincent Bernat; bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: RE: ECMP/multipath support
Hi Ondrej,
That really is wonderful news. Thank you very much :)
Please let me know
time and hard work.
Regards, Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Ondrej Zajicek [mailto:santi...@crfreenet.org]
Sent: 15 December 2010 11:38
To: Andrew Lemin
Cc: Vincent Bernat; bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: Re: ECMP/multipath support
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:03:08AM +, Andrew
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:03:08AM +, Andrew Lemin wrote:
Hello.
How is development coming along for adding multi-path route support into
BIRD?
We already have BIRD multipath support for OSPF, static and Linux kernel
protocols in our Git repository [*]. RIP will probably come
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:27:31PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I remember we had an discussion about multiple unnumbered ptp links between
two nodes. There was a potential problem in OSPF with asymmetric routing
but the conclusion was that it would not happen as BIRD didn't support ECMP.
Sent: 13 November 2010 00:21
To: Andrew Lemin
Cc: Vincent Bernat; bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: Re: ECMP/multipath support
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:38:55AM +, Andrew Lemin wrote:
Hi all,
What does the BIRD dev team think? Is there anything more I can do to help
with adding
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:38:55AM +, Andrew Lemin wrote:
Hi all,
What does the BIRD dev team think? Is there anything more I can do to help
with adding this functionality.
Hello, currently i am finalizing link state detection for OSPF.
After that i would probably look at ECMP.
--
this functionality.
We desperately need ECMP support in the RIP protocol. Thanks everyone :)
Regards, Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lemin
Sent: 04 October 2010 16:55
To: 'Vincent Bernat'; Ondrej Zajicek
Cc: bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: RE: ECMP/multipath support
Hi,
I see two
To: Andrew Lemin
Cc: Ondrej Zajicek; Vincent Bernat; bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: Re: ECMP/multipath support
Hello!
For us ECMP is important as we load balance connections to remote customer
sites across different ISPs for redundancy and performance.
When doing that, please keep in mind
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:55:12PM +0100, Andrew Lemin wrote:
As long as multipath is implemented in the RIP protocol too, then go
for the first method as it is the proper place for it. We NEED ECMP in
RIP though. Please.. :)
The point I was trying to make is by adding the functionality to the
-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz] On Behalf Of Vincent Bernat
Sent: 24 September 2010 10:41
To: bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: ECMP/multipath support
Hi!
BIRD does not support EMCP yet. Looking at the source code, BIRD seems to
be able to support ECMP routes internally by adding
...@crfreenet.org]
Sent: 01 October 2010 13:19
To: Andrew Lemin
Cc: Vincent Bernat; bird-us...@trubka.network.cz
Subject: Re: ECMP/multipath support
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:40:58AM +0100, Andrew Lemin wrote:
Hi Vincent,
This is something that we have also been after for some time too, and I
know
Hello!
For us ECMP is important as we load balance connections to remote customer
sites across different ISPs for redundancy and performance.
When doing that, please keep in mind that whenever the characteristics
(delay and throughput) of the lines are different, TCP congestion control
37 matches
Mail list logo
