On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:35:45PM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
>
>
> > On 6. Aug 2019, at 17:04, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> >
> > I just added support for integer sets in bgpmasks (see attached patch).
>
> Using this syntax:
>
> [= 123 [234, 345] * =]
>
> ?
Yes, like regular integer
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 17:04, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> I just added support for integer sets in bgpmasks (see attached patch).
Using this syntax:
[= 123 [234, 345] * =]
?
Thanks!
Clemens
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:34:48PM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I wonder: Is there a "nice" syntax to have sets (lists of ASs) inside of
> bgpmasks?
>
> I.e.,
>
> [= 123 [234, 345] * =]
>
> does not work (syntax error). Any other ideas?
Hello
I just added support
I like this sentiment ...
Thanks!
C
--
Von einem Mobiltelefon gesendet. Bitte die Kürze entschuldigen.
Sent from a mobile phone. Please excuse brevity.
> Am 06.08.2019 um 11:51 schrieb Maria Jan Matejka :
>
> It anyway seems reasonable to be implemented.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 12:37:49AM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > I think we started to require newer bison (although it should be checked
> > by configure and complained there). We aim to be compatible with 5 year
> > old systems,
On 06. 08. 19 11:50, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Ondrej Filip wrote:
>> I was able to prepare packages for CentOS 7. You can check
>> ftp://bird.network.cz/pub/bird/centos/7/x86_64
>
> aside of that the packages can't be downloaded (likely some permissions
>
> On 31/07/2019 22:34, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
>> Hello all -
>
>> I wonder: Is there a "nice" syntax to have sets (lists of ASs)
>> inside of bgpmasks?
>
>> I.e.,
>
>> [= 123 [234, 345] * =]
>
>> does not work (syntax error). Any other ideas?
>
> I have also run into this use case, but
Hello Ondrej,
On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> I was able to prepare packages for CentOS 7. You can check
> ftp://bird.network.cz/pub/bird/centos/7/x86_64
aside of that the packages can't be downloaded (likely some permissions
missing), your packages don't align with the Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/07/2019 22:34, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I wonder: Is there a "nice" syntax to have sets (lists of ASs)
> inside of bgpmasks?
>
> I.e.,
>
> [= 123 [234, 345] * =]
>
> does not work (syntax error). Any other ideas?
I have
On 05. 08. 19 21:35, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi Robert!
I was able to prepare packages for CentOS 7. You can check
ftp://bird.network.cz/pub/bird/centos/7/x86_64
Ondrej
>
> I'm seeing the following build failures with BIRD 2.0.5 on RHEL/CentOS 6,
> while BIRD 2.0.4 worked
On 05. 08. 19 21:13, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 07:57:49PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 01:08:18AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
Hello,
we had problem with IPv6 prefixes exchanged from HP (or Huawei) router
to linux router (BIRD) through IPv6 BGP RR (BIRD). And setting "missing
lladdr ignore;" on the BGP RR on peer towards linux routers solved our
problem. Otherwise the prefixes from HP/Huaweiu were not forwarded. And
12 matches
Mail list logo
