Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: > On 03/08/2017 03:12 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote: >> In that way, I see BIP150 as an extension of IP addresses, except more >> secure against network-level attackers. If you believe the concept of >> people establishing links

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev wrote: > >> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil : >> >> On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote: > Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers (and BIP150)

On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 20:47:54 CET Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD. > BIP150 has a fingerprint-free **OPTIONAL** authentication. It’s designed > to not reveal any node identifier/identity without first get a > crypto.-proof from other peer that he

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote: >>> Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way >> >> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ... >> guarantee node ownership“). > > Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD. I'm always willing to debate this issue.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] High consensus fork system for scaling without limits

Hi Erik, I have left you some comments below. Some general questions: How will you deal with excessive sighashing (i.e. massive transactions that include a lot of signature verification)? Presumably the sigops limit will increase proportionally? On 3/8/2017 2:42 PM, Erik Aronesty via

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers (and BIP150)

Hi Tom > Do you know the trick of having an open wifi basestation in a public street > and how that can lead to tracking? Especially if you have a network of them. > The trick is this; you set up an open wifi base station with a hidden ssid > and phones try to connect to it by saying “Are you

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil : > > On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote: Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way >>> >>> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ... >>> guarantee node ownership“). >>

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers

> >> >> > Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way > > This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ... guarantee > node ownership“). Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD. BIP150 has a fingerprint-free **OPTIONAL** authentication. It’s designed to not

[bitcoin-dev] High consensus fork system for scaling without limits

I woudl like to propose a BIP that works something like this: 1. Allow users to signal readiness by publishing an EB. This EB is an absolute upper bound, and cannot be overridden by miners. Current EB is 1MB, the status-quo. Maybe EB can be configured in a config file, not a UI, since it's an

[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Bitcoin Core version 0.14.0 is now available from: Or from the torrent,