Re: [bitcoin-dev] v3 onion services

2019-11-18 Thread Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
So I must ask the question: what is the rational for a bitcoin node to be hidden? ie to use RDV points like hidden services? For me the rational for bitcoin is to anonymize communications between nodes and/or clients, typically who sent this tx, not to hide that you are operating a bitcoin node,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] v3 onion services

2019-11-18 Thread Carl Dong via bitcoin-dev
Hi Mr. Lee Chiffre, I have been working on an implementation of addrv2 (BIP-155). Is this what you meant by I2P and Torv3 address support? My WIP pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16748 Merged BIP: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki Ongoing

Re: [bitcoin-dev] v3 onion services

2019-11-18 Thread LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
The Tor team encourages active participating Tor nodes, preferably exit/ middle/guard nodes and not only client nodes, which is actually a significant part of the reason that the documentation I put together in Bitcoin.SE does not deal much with configuration tweaking Tor; as out of the box Tor

Re: [bitcoin-dev] v3 onion services

2019-11-18 Thread Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
As I briefly sketched here before I think that a better long term solution would be to link the bitcoin traffic with something like node-Tor (https://github.com/Ayms/node-Tor) Much more light (the whole code not minified is only ~1MB), not using tons of libraries prone to security/maintenance