> On Aug 21, 2020, at 15:16, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
> Hmm, could that not be accomplished by simply building this into new
> messages? eg, send "betterprotocol", if you see a verack and no
> "betterprotocol" from your peer, send "worseprotocol" before you send a
> "verack".
>
> Matt
>
>> On
> On Aug 21, 2020, at 13:45, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
> This seems to be pretty overengineered.
I agree. In fact all proposals I’ve seen on this are over engineered.
> Do you have a specific use-case in mind for anything more than simply
> continuing the pattern we've been using of sending a m
Hello All,
In the past, discussions around how to securely store/use/setup PSBT's have
been decided as out of scope for BIP 174 - "it is not a specification of how
hardware wallets should behave, it is a description of a data structure and the
abstract workflow around it"
For example, Nicolas
