See the current patchset proposed:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22871/commits
Two things are happening that are separate:
1) Fixing the semantics of arg in OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
2) Fixing the semantics on nSequence in each tx input
There is no sense in conditioning part 1 on RBF or
> A thing I just realized about Braidpool is that the payout server is still a
> single central point-of-failure.
> However, this probably complicates the design too much, and it may be more
> beneficial to get *something* working now.
You have hit the nail on the head here and Chris Belcher's
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:07:47PM +0200, 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The reorg-interval X very much depends on the user's needs. One could
> argue that there should be, for example, three reorgs per day, each 48
> blocks apart.
Oh, wow, I think the last suggestion was every 100 blocks (every
