Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reorgs on SigNet - Looking for feedback on approach and parameters

On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 10:33:24PM -0700, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2021, at 00:53, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> Why bother with a version bit? This seems substantially more complicated > >> than the original proposal that surfaced many times before signet launched > >> to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reorgs on SigNet - Looking for feedback on approach and parameters

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 05:30, Michael Folkson wrote: > >  >> >> Can you explain the motivation for this? From where I sit, as far as I know, >> I should basically be > a prime example of the target market for public >> signet - someone developing bitcoin applications > with regular

[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 22.0 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 22.0 Release Notes == Bitcoin Core version 22.0 is now available from: Or through bittorrent:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reorgs on SigNet - Looking for feedback on approach and parameters

> Can you explain the motivation for this? From where I sit, as far as I know, > I should basically be > a prime example of the target market for public > signet - someone developing bitcoin applications > with regular requirements > to test those applications with other developers without >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Braidpool: Proposal for a decentralised mining pool

Hi Filippo, If a malicious miner, M broadcasts {m1, m2 ... mn} at a regular interval, *and* also broadcasts {m1*, mn*} where mn* is bitcoin block then M will cheat all other miners of their reward. You correctly identified this attack. The problem stems from the fact that I wanted to use the