Hi yanmaani
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 5:28 PM yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> What, no. The `k` value is calculated implicitly, because there's only
> one value of it that could ever be valid - if `k` is 1 too small, we're
> 70 years too far back, and t
What, no. The `k` value is calculated implicitly, because there's only
one value of it that could ever be valid - if `k` is 1 too small, we're
70 years too far back, and then the block will violate median of last
11. If `k` is 1 too large, we're 70 years too far in the future, then
the block wi
There is a hard fork wishlist:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hardfork_Wishlist
Note last update is somewhat old.
Cheers.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:49 AM James Lu via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Making Bitcoin function after 2038 is by definition a hard fork
>
>
> Then starting at Unix Epoch 0x8000, post-softfork nodes just increment
> the timestamp by 1 on each new block.
It is possible to go even faster. The fastest rate is something like that, if
you assume the time in the Genesis Block is zero:
0 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 ...
The
