Re: [bitcoin-dev] death to the mempool, long live the mempool

Good morning Gloria, et al, > > Removing the mempool would... naturally resolve all current issues inherent > > in package relay and rbf rules. > > Removing the mempool does not help with this. How does a miner decide whether > a conflicting transaction is an economically-advantageous

Re: [bitcoin-dev] death to the mempool, long live the mempool

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:44:45PM -0400, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Such a list of endpoints couldn't be static otherwise it's an artificial > barrier to enter in the mining competition, and as such a centralization > vector. Dynamic, trust-minimized discovery of the mining endpoints

Re: [bitcoin-dev] death to the mempool, long live the mempool

Good Afternoon, No. This has been discussed previously and eliminated as there is no proof that the transaction can exist without population through the mempool. As a method of payment not hearing about a transaction until it is possibly mined three months later as I have experienced is

[bitcoin-core-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.20.2 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 0.20.2 Release Notes Bitcoin Core version 0.20.2 is now available from: This minor release includes various bug fixes and performance improvements, as well as updated

Re: [bitcoin-dev] death to the mempool, long live the mempool

Hi Lisa, Network mempools constitute a blockspace marketplace where block demand meets the offer in real-time. Block producers are acting to discover the best feerate bids compensating for their operational costs and transaction proposers are acting to offer the best feerate in function of their