Good morning aj,
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:37:03AM +, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> > Subject: Beyond Jets: Microcode: Consensus-Critical Jets Without Softforks
>
> (Have you considered applying a jit or some other compression algorithm
> to your emails?)
>
> > Microcode For Bitcoin S
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 4:45 PM Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 02:04:29PM +, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > People opposed to having taproot transactions in their chain had over
> > three y
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 02:54:05PM +, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> My point is that in the past we were willing to discuss the complicated
> crypto math around cross-input sigagg in order to save bytes, so it seems to
> me that cross-input compression of puzzles/solutions at least merits
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:37:03AM +, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Subject: Beyond Jets: Microcode: Consensus-Critical Jets Without Softforks
(Have you considered applying a jit or some other compression algorithm
to your emails?)
> Microcode For Bitcoin SCRIPT
>
Devs,
I warmly invite you to join for pleb.fi/miami2022 if you are interested to
participate. It will be April 4th and 5th near miami.
The focus of this pleb.fi event will be the ins and outs of building
bitcoin stuff in rust with a focus on Sapio and a hackathon.
As the CTV Meeting overlaps wit
Devs,
Tutorial: https://rubin.io/bitcoin/2022/03/22/sapio-studio-btc-dev-mtg-6/
Meeting Logs:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-March/020157.html
Summary:
The 6th CTV meeting was a Sapio Studio tutorial. Sapio Studio is a Bitcoin
Wallet / IDE for playing with Bitcoin S
Hi Larry,
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm curious to know if this is helpful for pinning
as long as you have a way to
statically analyze Script to prevent witness stuffing [0]. I agree it *could*
still be useful for miners, but
subject to all the complications of RBF.
> An advantage of this m
Greetings list,
This is my first time posting here.
Question for you:
Should the Bitcoin Core mempool replace an existing transaction with one
that has the same txid (having the same effect, same spends and outputs)
but a sufficiently smaller witness (different wtxid) and thus a higher
feerate?
> What do you mean "capture that" and "your network"? I was imagining a
> scenario where these poll messages are always broadcast globally. Are you
> implying more of a private poll?
If you vote by making a Bitcoin transaction, then someone could move real
bitcoins, just by including your trans
Good morning again Russell,
> Good morning Russell,
>
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> > You don't think referring to the microcode via its hash, effectively using
> > 32-byte encoding of opcodes, is still rather long winded?
For that matter, since an entire microcode represents a language
Good morning Russell,
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> You don't think referring to the microcode via its hash, effectively using
> 32-byte encoding of opcodes, is still rather long winded?
A microcode is a *mapping* of `OP_` codes to a variable-length sequence of
`UOP_` micro-opcodes.
So a
Thanks for the clarification.
You don't think referring to the microcode via its hash, effectively using
32-byte encoding of opcodes, is still rather long winded?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:23 PM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Russell,
>
> > Setting aside my thoughts that something like Simplic
Good morning Russell,
> Setting aside my thoughts that something like Simplicity would make a better
> platform than Bitcoin Script (due to expression operating on a more narrow
> interface than the entire stack (I'm looking at you OP_DEPTH)) there is an
> issue with namespace management.
>
> I
> > Even if it is not needed, it is kind of "free" if you take transaction size
> > into account
>
> But it would require an on-chain transaction. We don't want 6 billion people
> to have to send an on-chain transaction all in the same week in order to
> register their preference on something.
> If you vote by making transactions, then someone could capture that and
broadcast to nodes
> you can only send that to your network
What do you mean "capture that" and "your network"? I was imagining a
scenario where these poll messages are always broadcast globally. Are you
implying more of a
Setting aside my thoughts that something like Simplicity would make a
better platform than Bitcoin Script (due to expression operating on a more
narrow interface than the entire stack (I'm looking at you OP_DEPTH)) there
is an issue with namespace management.
If I understand correctly, your implic
16 matches
Mail list logo
