Good morning Jorge,
> OP_CAT was removed. If I remember correctly, some speculated that perhaps it
> was removed because it could allow covenants.I don't remember any technical
> concern about the OP besides enabling covenants.Before it was a common
> opinion that covenants shouldn't be
So, to be clear, you didn't design speedy trial "to make everyone unhappy"
as Ryan claims, no?
That's a really strange claim on his part.
When the grace period for slower activation after lock in was added, I
don't think it was added to make me or people like me who dislike that
proposal unhappy.
OP_CAT was removed. If I remember correctly, some speculated that perhaps
it was removed because it could allow covenants.
I don't remember any technical concern about the OP besides enabling
covenants.
Before it was a common opinion that covenants shouldn't be enabled in
bitcoin because, despite
On Fri, 6 May 2022 7:17PM Jorge Tim?n wrote
> But let's not personally attack andreas for his opinions.
> The only reason you don't like bip8 is because you're ignorant about it and
> you haven't reviewed it enough.
Can you see the irony in equating "clueless about BIP119" with a
personal attack
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Russell O'Connor wrote the definitive explanation for how ST arose in
>> the consensus process and how it was designed to make everyone
>> unhappy. It's a great explanation of what we
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 4:36 PM Ryan Grant wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 8:49 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2022, 09:22 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> >> [...] Andreas is clueless about BIP 119 and other covenant
> >>
