Jonas, all,:
So I do want to ask a couple further clarifying questions on this point, but I
got rather majorly sidetracked :)
I wonder can you (and other list readers!) take a look at my attempt here to
summarize what is described in Footnote 2 of the draft BIP (as it's related to
this discussi
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:40:58PM -0400, Gloria Zhao via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Does it make sense for these to be configurable, rather than implied
> > by the version?
> > … would it be better to either just not do sendpackages
> > at all if you're limiting ancestors in the mempool incompatibly
>
Thank you for taking the time to look at the BIP and reference code, waxwing. I
don't know if you're overlooking anything, so let me try to restate the
paragraph in the BIP draft that attempts to cover this topic [0].
Suppose signers would just abort in the presence of identical public keys. In
t
