Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable

2022-06-29 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hey On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:43 AM Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > @Eric > > People who transact are realizing the benefit of money - the avoidance > of barter costs. > > I'm very confident you're incorrect that holders don't receive any benefit >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable

2022-06-19 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hey On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:04 PM Manuel Costa via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > "Long time listener, first time caller". Just sharing my 2 sats: > > While I find it stimulating, I think this discussion (and other similar > doom-like scenarios) is somewhat irrele

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial

2022-03-24 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hey On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 7:34 PM Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > If I find out I'm in the economic minority then I have little choice but > > to either accept the existence of the new rules or sell my Bitcoin > > I do worry about what I have called a "dumb majority soft fork". This

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin.org missing bitcoin core version 22.0

2021-10-20 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hi Owen, On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:25 PM Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote: > > > It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent > > > bitcoin core. > > > > There is only one we

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-17 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hi yanmaani On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 5:28 PM yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > What, no. The `k` value is calculated implicitly, because there's only > one value of it that could ever be valid - if `k` is 1 too small, we're > 70 years too far back, and t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-17 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
There is a hard fork wishlist: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hardfork_Wishlist Note last update is somewhat old. Cheers. On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:49 AM James Lu via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Making Bitcoin function after 2038 is by definition a hard fork > >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting

2021-10-16 Thread Kate Salazar via bitcoin-dev
Hi, BIP 42 is a code base consensus soft fork that at the time of activation does not really manifest as a fork because nobody is running any code not already applying it. Can a similar thing be done in 17 years? (I haven't really made sense of this year 2038 problem, I don't know or understand wha