Good morning Prayank,
> Thanks for sharing all the details. One thing that I am not sure about:
>
> > * We already ***know*** that blockchains cannot scale
> > * Your plan for scaling is to make ***more*** blockchains?
>
> Scaling Bitcoin can be different from scaling Bitcoin sidechains. You can
> of course stacks can do this even without drivechain, so not sure whatwe're
> hiding from there
Stacks is not a Bitcoin sidechain IMO. It has its own native token which isn't
pegged to BTC. Premined. It uses Bitcoin as a storage and broadcast medium for
recording all blocks. Marketing with l
Good morning ZmnSCPxj,
Thanks for sharing all the details. One thing that I am not sure about:
> * We already ***know*** that blockchains cannot scale
> * Your plan for scaling is to make ***more*** blockchains?
Scaling Bitcoin can be different from scaling Bitcoin sidechains. You can
experimen
drivechain is a cool proposal. i don't think there's a ton of
obvious risk to the network itself (not slow, not too much work for
nodes, etc), but it seems to encourage "bad behavior", not sure the
incentives line up to prevent thefts, and not sure that won't turn
around and bite bitcoin's main c
Good morning Prayank,
Just to be clear, neither Liquid nor RSK, as of my current knowledge, are
Drivechain systems.
Instead, they are both federated sidechains.
The money owned by a federated sidechain is, as far s the Bitcoin blockchain is
concerned, really owned by the federation that.runs th
printf("Hello, World!");
What are your thoughts on Drivechain and associated BIPs?
This article compares Liquid and Lightning:
https://blog.liquid.net/six-differences-between-liquid-and-lightning/. Two
things from it that I am interested in while evaluating Drivechain:
1.Trust model
2.On-Ramps
