[bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active

[bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

I am opposed to the addition of Kalle Alm at this time. Those who believe that adding him will resolve the situation with Luke-jr's inappropriate behavior re: PR1104 are mistaken. 27e59ffd51ee5a95d0e0faff70e045faca10b00015e90abc1c8de48b1dfff40c ___ bi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK adding Kalle. Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role. -- @JeremyRubin On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Unless there

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK. p. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:09 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. > > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP e

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK adding Kalle. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM Jeremy via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK adding Kalle. > > Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role. > -- > @JeremyRubin >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK. Kalle has been exceptional throughout his contributions — especially thankful for btcdeb 🙏 On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 3:51 AM Pindar Wong via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK. > > p. > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:09 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-d

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

Hi Luke, For the records and the subscribers of this list not following #bitcoin-core-dev, this mail follows a discussion which did happen during yesterday irc meetings. Logs here : http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-core-dev/2021-04-22.log I'll reiterate my opinion expressed during the meeting. If this p

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK adding Kalle On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:51 PM Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hi Luke, > > For the records and the subscribers of this list not following > #bitcoin-core-dev, this mail follows a discussion which did happen during > yesterday irc

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

What is preventing the BIP maintainership role from moving to a bot? It does seem like a bot should be able to do a fine job given the explicit criteria (though ignoring obvious spam is often nice, its by no means a requirement). Given recent events where humans haveacted like humans, it see

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 04:42:12AM +, Greg Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I am opposed to the addition of Kalle Alm at this time. Those who > believe [this] will resolve the situation [...] re: PR1104 are > mistaken. PR1104 has been merged. Do you continue to oppose the addition? Thanks,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK for adding Kalle. Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo. - Sjors > Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev > het volgende geschreven: > > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Al

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK for Kalle. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK for adding Kalle. > > Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently > 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo. > > - Sjors > > > Op 23 apr.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

On Friday, April 23rd, 2021 at 4:09 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. ACK on adding Kalle. I'm happy to finally see someone else interested in BIP maintainer role,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

Kalle should not be made an editor by an ad-hoc process. I reiterate Greg's NACK. I propose that we form a stewardship committee of frequent contributors, including you, Greg, and 21 others. The stewards appoint a small set of editors with permanent oversight by the stewards. A defined process pre

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

A committee to guide the committee? You guys truly have lost the plot. All the good minds and cryptographers have left Bitcoin. What remains is an empty echo chamber. Truth is these problems start with lack of vision and long-term roadmap, not with the processes themselves. And the Bitcoin Core

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

A good solution here is to make it clear to visitors that facilitation, mediation, and organisation help is badly needed in the core development team. People with such expertise can even be hired directly. A good facilitator opens communication paths between all parties, leaving everyone satisfie

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:59 AM Amir Taaki via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > A committee to guide the committee? You guys truly have lost the plot. > > All the good minds and cryptographers have left Bitcoin. What remains is > an empty echo chamber. > > Truth is the