On March 2, 2023 6:20:35 PM GMT, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a normal
>service bit assignment...?
The purpose of the experimental service bits is experiments. If the details of
utreexo aren't nailed down and may ch
This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a
normal service bit assignment...?
Luke
On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Hello all,
Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1
<< 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable
Hello all,
Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 << 24) to
signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet as requested
by the comment in protocol.h in bitcoind
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src
