It is quite ironic that yeah, it is quite ironic that the people who are
constantly basing their arguments on personal attack are also the ones who
complain the most about personal attacks. That's exactly the irony I was
trying to convey.
Just like some people claim that the only people against
So, to be clear, you didn't design speedy trial "to make everyone unhappy"
as Ryan claims, no?
That's a really strange claim on his part.
When the grace period for slower activation after lock in was added, I
don't think it was added to make me or people like me who dislike that
proposal unhappy.
On Fri, 6 May 2022 7:17PM Jorge Tim?n wrote
> But let's not personally attack andreas for his opinions.
> The only reason you don't like bip8 is because you're ignorant about it and
> you haven't reviewed it enough.
Can you see the irony in equating "clueless about BIP119" with a
personal attack
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Russell O'Connor wrote the definitive explanation for how ST arose in
>> the consensus process and how it was designed to make everyone
>> unhappy. It's a great explanation of what we
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 4:36 PM Ryan Grant wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 8:49 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2022, 09:22 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> >> [...] Andreas is clueless about BIP 119 and other covenant
> >>
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 8:49 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022, 09:22 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>> [...] Andreas is clueless about BIP 119 and other covenant
>> proposals. He is spreading misinformation and [...]
> Clueless and spreading disinformation, you
+1 alicexbt
We of course want knowledgeable bitcoiners who aren't knowledgeable about a
certain proposal to be skeptical. But what we don't want is for that
natural skepticism-from-ignorance to be interpreted as opposition, or
really a strong signal of any kind. Any thoughts from ignorance,
On Sun, May 1, 2022, 09:22 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Maybe the whole thing worked as designed. Some users identified what was
> going on, well known Bitcoin educators such as Andreas Antonopoulos, Jimmy
> Song etc brought additional
Hi Michael,
> Maybe the whole thing worked as designed. Some users identified what was
> going on, well known Bitcoin educators such as Andreas Antonopoulos, Jimmy
> Song etc brought additional attention to the dangers, a URSF movement started
> to gain momentum and those attempting a
I’ve been in two minds on whether to completely move on to other topics or to
formulate some thoughts on the recent attempt to activate a contentious soft
fork. In the interests of those of us who have wasted days/weeks/months of our
time on this (with no personal upside) and who don’t want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
