Re: [bitcoin-dev] easypaysy - A layer-two protocol to send payments without addresses

2019-12-06 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Jose, > > If the service provider retains even partial control, then it can refuse to > > cooperate with the user and the user will be unable to update his or her > > account. > > This is not fixable by the use of mirror servers. > > You are right about that too… (I wonder if

Re: [bitcoin-dev] easypaysy - A layer-two protocol to send payments without addresses

2019-12-06 Thread Jose Femenías Cañuelo via bitcoin-dev
Hi ZmnSCPxj, first of all: do you ever sleep?;-) A few points about your reply: a) The easypaysy white paper isn’t a final set of specifications. Instead it is meant as a somewhat detailed draft of the ideas that can drive a working set of specifications. As such, any qualified input -as

Re: [bitcoin-dev] easypaysy - A layer-two protocol to send payments without addresses

2019-12-06 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Jose, > Hi ZmnSCPxj, > > first of all: do you ever sleep? ;-) It seems possible, that, I do not. > b) Master accounts are included in the white paper as a feature for a future > release. > The roadmap is not set yet, but I’d like to include a first release of the > protocol that