-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2012 01:07, Gary Rowe wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> This looks like a good idea to me. The test suites could act
> similarly to the 100% Pure Java approach that successfully fended
> off a lot of corrupting influences to Java over the years.
>
> Ma
I have no objections to a rc1 happening before I'm back.
--
Gavin Andresen
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release,
>> before leveldb or ultraprune or anything
On Thursday, August 02, 2012 4:43:25 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Opening the floor... What do we collectively want to happen, before
> 0.7 release? What is the todo list for 0.7?
Based on pull-capable dev comments, I've personally noted these branches as
accepted for 0.7:
> 7) HOPEFULLY: Addnode o
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release,
> before leveldb or ultraprune or anything major lands. There is no
> major landmark feature, but just a useful collection of small changes.
> It seems like a good time to
There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release,
before leveldb or ultraprune or anything major lands. There is no
major landmark feature, but just a useful collection of small changes.
It seems like a good time to Release Early, Release Often and make a
checkpoint release.
Hi Steve,
This looks like a good idea to me. The test suites could act similarly to
the 100% Pure Java approach that successfully fended off a lot of
corrupting influences to Java over the years.
Maybe it's worth putting together a small starter suite of tests and
showing them to the community th
6 matches
Mail list logo
