On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 7:56:23 PM slush wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> > wider community participation.
>
> It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
> proposa
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> wider
> community participation.
It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
proposals.
> The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I don't feel I understand the effort required to do some kind of
> partial tree encoding. Having a kind of custom compression whereby
> branches are represented as varint indexes into a dictionary, I can
> feel how much work that involve
On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 6:47:34 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Thursdays at 18:00 UTC (6PM Europe/1PM east US/10AM west US) seem to
> be a good time for the core dev team to meet on the #bitcoin-dev
> freenode IRC channel to chat.
>
> I'd like to talk about:
>
> o Can we put together a TODO lis
Thursdays at 18:00 UTC (6PM Europe/1PM east US/10AM west US) seem to
be a good time for the core dev team to meet on the #bitcoin-dev
freenode IRC channel to chat.
I'd like to talk about:
o Can we put together a TODO list to get to a 0.8 release candidate ?
o Is it time to feature-freeze 0.8 and
5 matches
Mail list logo