Sounds awesome!
Pieter told me at lunch that headers first cut sync time to 45 minutes for
him, which is another amazing improvement from the master of optimisations.
Pieter, Matt and I also agreed that for maximum impact we should really try
to ship payment protocol support in at least two
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:09:48AM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
Sounds awesome!
Pieter told me at lunch that headers first cut sync time to 45 minutes for
him, which is another amazing improvement from the master of optimisations.
Just to make sure nobody expects a magic bullet: this was on a
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:22 AM, slush sl...@centrum.cz wrote:
We're planning to support payment protocol in Trezor as well, if it
counts. I think it's a missing piece in absolute security of hardware
wallets.
Yup, that's always been the plan :-)
Any idea how much work it is, and would it
Pieter, Matt and I also agreed that for maximum impact we should really
try to ship payment protocol support in at least two clients simultaneously
and ideally with a big merchant signed up too - to send a powerful message
that we really mean it. Someone volunteered last week to do it for
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.comwrote:
It feels to me like we're close to a 0.9 feature freeze / start of
release cycle; I'd like to talk a little bit about what we'd like to see in
the final 0.9 release.
Payment Protocol support is ready to be pulled (
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
Fully agreed about payment protocol, autotools and Qt5 build.
I'm still not very excited about coin control (and last time I looked at the
code, it has an issue that it introduced statefulness into the wallet model
- a bane
Our plan is to add support for that into v1 firmware, but it also depends
on readiness of surrounding infrastructure; mainly if there'll be support
for payment protocol in multibit in the time of v1 release (I suppose that
the Multibit will be the first wallet compatible with Trezor AND
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:22 AM, slush sl...@centrum.cz wrote:
We're planning to support payment protocol in Trezor as well, if it
counts. I think it's a missing piece in absolute security of hardware
wallets.
Yup,
Mike,
If bitcoinj will be ready and you will help us, we are willing to implement it
right away in Hive as well. We will also keep BitcoinKit.framework updated with
the new bitcoind and bitcoinj implementations.
BitPay taking the lead here would be tremendous. Hopefully cool sites like
Mike asked what non-0.9 code I'm working on; the three things on the top of
my list are:
1) Smarter fee handling on the client side, instead of hard-coded fees. I
was busy today generating scatter-plots and histograms of transaction fees
versus priorities to get some insight into what miner
On 16 August 2013 03:00, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike asked what non-0.9 code I'm working on; the three things on the top
of my list are:
1) Smarter fee handling on the client side, instead of hard-coded fees. I
was busy today generating scatter-plots and histograms of
11 matches
Mail list logo
