On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> If the use case is: I give the Foundation a "here's where to pay my salary"
> PaymentRequest, maybe with several Outputs each having a different xpubkey,
> then it seems to me the Foundation's wallet software should take care of
> iterating
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I think the right way to integrate BIP32 and BIP70 would be to specify
> output scripts as normal for backwards compatibility, and then allow each
> output to have an additional xpubkey and iteration count field. The
> iteration counts could be
I think the one thing that SSL does provide is some protection against ARP
or DNS poisoning to trick the user into downloading from a different site.
The PGP WoT surrounding bitcoin or OS related ISOs be weak - I am not sure
if I could even check it directly myself despite spending a few hours
tra
I think the right way to integrate BIP32 and BIP70 would be to specify
output scripts as normal for backwards compatibility, and then allow each
output to have an additional xpubkey and iteration count field. The
iteration counts could be unsigned.
Unfortunately to add data that isn't signed requi
First off, nice article. Very clear and informative.
I don't know if this is the best place to post this, but it seems related
to me.
As more wallets implement BIP32, I believe that bitcoin wallets should
begin to encourage people to use
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediaw
I wrote an article intended for a broad/non-developer audience on a few
Bitcoin privacy topics:
- P2P connection encryption
- Address re-use/payment protocol
- CoinJoin and merge avoidance
I don't think there's anything much new here for people who were involved
with the BIP70 design discussions,
6 matches
Mail list logo
