On 2015-02-15 17:13, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>
>> Yes you are dicking around.
>
> I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router
> talking to its P2P interface.
>
> The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply und
On 02/15/2015 11:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> Most money/payment systems include some method to reverse or undo
> payments made in error. In these systems, the longer settlement
> times you mention below are a feature, not a bug, and give more
> time for a human to react to errors and sys
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> > Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?
>
>
>
> Since RPC interface does not scale to serve a multi user service.
> In absence of better
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Repeating past statements, it is acknowledged that Peter's scorched
> earth replace-by-fee proposal is aptly named, and would be widely
> anti-social on the current network.
>
> At a high level, we can see that this thread is contentiou
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > Yes you are dicking around.
>
> I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking
> to its P2P interface.
Ah, sorry, that wasn't clear to me.
> The
On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Yes you are dicking around.
I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking to
its P2P interface.
The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the
protocol, aids debugging
and now comes hand
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:04:49AM -0800, Adam Back wrote:
> Strongly with Peter on this. That its highly complex to maintain strict
> consensus between bitcoin versions, does not justify consensus rewrite
> experiments; it tells you that the risk is exponentially worse and people
> should use and
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> Peter,
>
> You did not address me but libbitcoin. Since our story and your evaluation is
> probably similar, I chime in.
>
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>
> > So stop wasting your time. Help get the consensus c
Hi All,
I am currently running some tests on the peering system in Bitcoind for a
research paper. We hope to develop improvements which we can share with the
community. A wide diversity of real peers.dat files would be very helpful.
If you are willing, please email me your peers.dat.
Thanks,
--
9 matches
Mail list logo