Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%

2015-05-26 Thread joliver
You're the Chief Scientist of __ViaCoin__ a alt with 30 second blocks and you have big banks as clients. Shit like replace-by-fee and leading the anti-scaling mob is for your clients, not Bitcoin. Get the fuck out. Peter Todd - 8930511 Canada Ltd. 1214-1423 Mississauga Valley Blvd. Mississauga O

Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)

2015-02-22 Thread joliver
On 2015-02-22 14:33, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 02:11:31PM +, Adam Back wrote: >> My actual point outside of the emotive stuff (and I should've stayed >> away from that too) is how about we explore ways to improve practical >> security of fast confirmation transactions, and if

Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)

2015-02-15 Thread joliver
On 2015-02-15 17:13, Tamas Blummer wrote: > On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > >> Yes you are dicking around. > > I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router > talking to its P2P interface. > > The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply und

Re: [Bitcoin-development] The relationship between Proof-of-Publication and Anti-Replay Oracles

2015-01-06 Thread joliver
On 2014-12-22 00:11, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:48:01AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: > The classic "proof-of-publication" system is to embed opaque data (as > far as bitcoin miners are concerned) in transactions using OP_RETURN. > A significance of establishing "proof-of-publication