potential
as a bounce pad/egg drop location but not much - no heap spraying as
such, or d/c tors, or heap header structs, etc. Im sure someone is sure
to come up with something very clever tho. just not me.
cheers,
steve
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/09/2013 06:42 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
OK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 11/10/2012 16:46, Gavin Andresen wrote:
Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?
essentially yes - in all seriousness, I have come around to your way
of thinking, it is not worth arguing about. we end up in the same
. :)
This is a top post and there is nothing inline so i snipped it.
cheers,
steve
On 03/10/2012 06:03, Peter Vessenes wrote:
Oops, I accidentally didn't reply-all to Steve. I am ccing my
detailed response to steve to the list since I think people are
wondering about how the Foundation fits in; trash
-0700
From: Peter Vessenes pe...@coinlab.com
To: steve st...@mistfpga.net
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:15 PM, steve st...@mistfpga.net wrote:
On 01/10/2012 17:52, Peter Vessenes wrote:
I'm a big proponent of a testing project.
I am very happy to hear this, however, your actual words
to work, but it doesnt. It
does show quite a lot of work that I have done though. If you were to
say to me, 'steve, by monday we need end to end, requirements based
testing' It would be done. (I have already spent over 4 months on
this) Leaderless leadership is something I am having a hard time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2012 03:02, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:15 PM, steve st...@mistfpga.net wrote:
Im ready to go, more or less. Please check out the links in my
previous emails. I have over 400 testcases (8 platforms * 50
release tests
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:26 PM, steve st...@mistfpga.net
wrote:
Hi Gavin,
Sorry for the delayed response, I wanted to take a couple of days
to reflect on your email.
On 26/09/2012 19:09, Gavin Andresen wrote:
And their are other methods too.
The GUI::Test package
would rather go for interoperability between testing rather than
rewriting it all.
Cheers,
steve
Matt
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:32 +0100, steve wrote:
Hi All,
After the failure to get any real testing done for the 0.7
release (all of which is my fault) I have decided to rejig
things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/09/2012 13:49, Wladimir wrote:
Steve,
Hi Wladimir,
So, currently there are 4 potential places for bugs to be
reported 1 - jenkins (and unit tests) 2 - git 3 - mailing list 4
- forum
processes? even if it is just
some encouragement, it is all greatly appreciated.
Drop me an email if you want access to the current setup and help me
review the different software for the bitcoin workflow process.
cheers,
steve
- --
my PGP public key is at pgp.mit.edu id: 0x5016FB50
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2012 01:07, Gary Rowe wrote:
Hi Steve,
This looks like a good idea to me. The test suites could act
similarly to the 100% Pure Java approach that successfully fended
off a lot of corrupting influences to Java over the years.
Maybe
.
cheers,
steve
I do not belive this to be related, but I am not ashamed and feel no
stigma. I have posted this on a public forum. I suffer from fast
cycling (withing a day) type two bipolar disorder. This has been and
is being managed very well by my meds (300mg quetiapine fumerate and
30mg
On 25/07/2012 10:45, Michael Grønager wrote:
Hi Steve,
I see dramatic differences in performance on virtual machines vs
running directly on the iron. I am not an expert in virtual
machines,
They can be, it depends on how they are set up. For reference, these
VM's used to test network
to australia tomorrrow, so I will set some breakpoints and do
some timings in a debugger.
This will all happen on an e-450 (wonderful machine!)
Thanks very much for your response. it would seem that I am 'doing it
wrong' :/
cheers mate,
steve
(this message isnt signed because I have forgotten my
, and approx 3gb/s internet
connection it took 2 hours to sync the last 5 days.
Maybe i am missing something important...
Any additional information that you could provide to help me with
testing would be really appreciated.
cheers,
steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32
4a/ Serialize all request/response exchanges. i.e. request comes in
from remote node, proxy aquires lock on the proxy-localdaemon channel
and sends request. Channel remains locked until response is received or
timeout (in which case remote node gets no response). Unlock channel
after
While I'm asking questions I'll add one more regarding the getaddr
message.
Talking to myself here. I just sent this message then found this
brilliant set of articles in the Dev Tech forum which answers the
question very nicely: *https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41722.0
17 matches
Mail list logo
