On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction into
the mempool:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
However the implementation of the STRICTENC flag simply makes pubkey
formats it doesn't recognize act as through the signature was invalid,
rather than failing the transaction. Similar to the invalid due to too
many sigops
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we either change STRICTENC to simply fail unrecognized pubkeys
immediately - similar to how non-standard signatures are treated - or
fail the script if the pubkey is non-standard and signature verification
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:47:29AM -0800, Pieter Wuille wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
However the implementation of the STRICTENC flag simply makes pubkey
formats it doesn't recognize act as through the signature was invalid,
rather than failing
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:45:09 -0500
Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction
into the mempool:
5 matches
Mail list logo
