On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:45:09 -0500
Peter Todd wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
> > So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction
> > into the mempool:
> >
> > 010001140de229e08fda25cbc16ded2618cdacce49fcb18c0b6ccdace00040909adae400
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:47:29AM -0800, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > However the implementation of the STRICTENC flag simply makes pubkey
> > formats it doesn't recognize act as through the signature was invalid,
> > rather than failing the transac
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
>> I suggest we either change STRICTENC to simply fail unrecognized pubkeys
>> immediately - similar to how non-standard signatures are treated - or
>> fail the script if the pubkey is non-standard and signature verification
>> succeeds.
>
> Sou
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> However the implementation of the STRICTENC flag simply makes pubkey
> formats it doesn't recognize act as through the signature was invalid,
> rather than failing the transaction. Similar to the invalid due to too
> many sigops DoS attack I foun
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
> So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction into
> the mempool:
>
> 010001140de229e08fda25cbc16ded2618cdacce49fcb18c0b6ccdace00040909adae49000493046022100f7828d81c849c5448ba5ba4ef55df6b4d0ba3ae3f1a59c
So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction into
the mempool:
010001140de229e08fda25cbc16ded2618cdacce49fcb18c0b6ccdace00040909adae49000493046022100f7828d81c849c5448ba5ba4ef55df6b4d0ba3ae3f1a59cff3291880c2c8e524f022100d2f5bc9dc2f0674eded31023cb47e61a596e10f8f1dd
6 matches
Mail list logo
