Hi AdamISZ/waxwing,
I discussed with the maintainers, and we do consider MuSig2 and adaptor
signatures to be in-scope. However, we don't currently plan to proactively add
these features ourselves.
The reason the library currently contains an implementation of BIP 340 and not
only raw elliptic cu
Thanks for this.
Seems like a great initiative for, as you say, prototyping and education.
(though iiuc your primary motive was standardising proposal "reference"
code).
I'm guessing that things like MuSig2 and/or adaptors would be out of scope
of this project? (i.e. you are only supplying the
