Thankyou for the warning, I had realised that, and I should have made that
more clear in my message; however, the only thing I dislike about windows is
price and the interface; now that I have the option to run blackbox (even if
not in the native format that I'm used to, and its only a clone desig
>
> Thankyou, now my transition to Windows is complete; of course I'll still get
> an xserver
> up and running so that I can run linux apps :) but that can wait for now!
>
do realize bb4win is *based* on blackbox and is not really even a fork. Not
saying you should avoid it, just realize they
On Fri, 3 May 2002 13:03:15 +0930
John Kennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> applications run (or if they will run at all!). Final question, and I know
> that its very windows specific, but is it possible to change the shell for a
> given user only??
If you are running 2k or XP I think you
From: Adam Hooper [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 13:30
>>Try a google search for "blackbox windows" and look at the first result.
>>Better than what you were expecting, I think! :)
OMG!! This is so perfect, I knew that I shouldn't have restricted my search
>>
>> at the top of Workspace::raiseWindow() there is a check for whether the
>> window
>> is on top of the stack or not. Comment out that check and let me know if it
>> still happens.
>>
>
> Done. I'll let you know if it still happens. The problem is it's such an
> erratic
> bug - it happens
On 03-May-2002 Adam Hooper wrote:
> Try a google search for "blackbox windows" and look at the first result.
> Better than what you were expecting, I think! :)
>
Wow, I am sure Brad will be honoured (-:
Try a google search for "blackbox windows" and look at the first result. Better than
what you were expecting, I think! :)
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 May 2002 13:03:15 +0930
John Kennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I apologise for being off-topic, but this is the only resource t
I apologise for being off-topic, but this is the only resource that I could
think of besides google which hasn't proved very useful so far.
I am thinking of going back to Windows (for specific programs, I need for
Uni (Access & VB)) and so I can play games; however, I do not want to lose
my belov
On 03-May-2002 Duret Bertrand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just released a beta version of BBCD: it's a new bbtool (as far as I
> know), and it's yet another CD player.
>
> It is still in development, but it may be used to play CDs. If you are
> interested, go there:
>http://tranber1.free.fr
On Thu, 02 May 2002 18:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03-May-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
> > Having problems with stacking... the same menu and slit
> > not-always-on-top-as-they-should-be problems already noted, but getting a
> > few odd window problems. Sylp
Hello,
I have just released a beta version of BBCD: it's a new bbtool (as far as I
know), and it's yet another CD player.
It is still in development, but it may be used to play CDs. If you are
interested, go there:
http://tranber1.free.fr/bbcd.html
Bye,
Bertrand.
On 03-May-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
> Having problems with stacking... the same menu and slit
> not-always-on-top-as-they-should-be problems already noted, but getting a few
> odd window problems. Sylpheed (my mail client) was under several other
> windows,
> with part of it still visible. I clicked
Having problems with stacking... the same menu and slit
not-always-on-top-as-they-should-be problems already noted, but getting a few
odd window problems. Sylpheed (my mail client) was under several other windows,
with part of it still visible. I clicked, but it wouldn't raise, I
alt+left-clicked,
On 02-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 02 May 2002 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Those of you with time to burn should go through and help them clean up
>> the blackbox area.
>
> What do you have in mind when you say "clean up"?
>
check
On Thu, 02 May 2002 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those of you with time to burn should go through and help them clean up
> the blackbox area.
What do you have in mind when you say "clean up"?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Those of you with time to burn should go through and help them clean up the
blackbox area.
On 02-May-2002 mackstann wrote:
>> I have always hated that behaviour as well. Brad is
>> working out a menu rewrite
>> for the new blackbox lib. We will probably start
>> working on usability aspects
>> then.
>
> while we're on the subject, i've always wondered why
> torn off menus don't act l
>
> bbkeys seems to work well in spite of the QT vs. Gtk debate. As hardware
> gets faster, software should run faster, but hey, that is only my opinion.
>
I still use older hardware and intend to keep blackbox as lean as possible. My
viewpoint is a lean and mean blackbox leaves more CPU and m
Derek Cunningham wrote:
> Yeah... this is the only way to go... session management just reduces a need
> for people to THINK about how they use their computer. I've spend a
> considerable number of hours (cumulative, not all at once) considering how I
> can effectively setup my desktop, as well as
Hello
I wonder how I quit from getting mail from this list.
Regards
Jim
On Thu, May02,02 00:35, thelupine wrote:
> > > Third: Is there a default/global setting to force BB to
> > > remember windows postion, size...attributes? I'll
> > > resize and position a window the way I want it, and then
> > > it loses this the next time I launch it.
> >
> > Once you decide how
On Thu, May02,02 00:13, Ciprian Popovici wrote:
> Monday, April 29, 2002, 16:11:39, Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, it IS possible to warp the position of the mouse cursor:
> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/xwarppointer/?topic_id=861
> > There's also a program called xbut (xb
--- Alexander Volovics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:59:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> > that if we add keybinding support to the menu we will probably
> integrate full
> > keybinding support back into blackbox. You will note flux already did
> this,
>
> I
> I have always hated that behaviour as well. Brad is
> working out a menu rewrite
> for the new blackbox lib. We will probably start
> working on usability aspects
> then.
while we're on the subject, i've always wondered why
torn off menus don't act like GTK ones. i tear it
off, but then if i
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:59:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> that if we add keybinding support to the menu we will probably integrate full
> keybinding support back into blackbox. You will note flux already did this,
I realized this a minute after I had posted the email :(
Even thou
25 matches
Mail list logo
