On Sat, 18 May 2002 14:22:18 +0200
Mads Martin Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you of course reported it, so they know?
>
> --
> Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk
> "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
> and totally illogic, with just a little bit m
* Mr. X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [May 16. 2002 23:25]:
> Yeah, it IS a Mozilla problem, it DOES still happen with rc2, and it CAN
> happen on Flash pages...if they use sound. It's one of the few really
> annoying bugs Mozilla has. I hope they get it fixed soon.
And you of course reported it, so they
On Thu, 16 May 2002 11:37:54 +0100
"Robert Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's a BB problem at all. AFAICS it's mozilla waiting
> > for a resource that's not free. I've seen it in the past as
> > well. Just kill the program occupying the resource, and mozilla
> > continues
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
> * Mr. X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [May 16. 2002 05:14]:
>> > hmm, scary, mozilla is an mp3 player too? eek.
>> >
>> > I wonder if this is part of the issue.
>>
>> No, I didn't mean playing mp3s WITH Mozilla, I meant with XMMS, or
>> Freeamp, or anyt
* Mr. X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [May 16. 2002 05:14]:
> > hmm, scary, mozilla is an mp3 player too? eek.
> >
> > I wonder if this is part of the issue.
>
> No, I didn't mean playing mp3s WITH Mozilla, I meant with XMMS, or
> Freeamp, or anything for that matter. That makes Mozilla freeze at
> sites
On Wed, 15 May 2002 13:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, scary, mozilla is an mp3 player too? eek.
>
> I wonder if this is part of the issue.
No, I didn't mean playing mp3s WITH Mozilla, I meant with XMMS, or
Freeamp, or anything for that matter. That mak
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it
> here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
>
> Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreat
On 15-May-2002 Mr.X wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not
>> #recreate it
>> here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
>>
>> Anyone out there mind giving this on
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not
> #recreate it
> here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
>
> Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a)
> re
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > The description sounds very similiar to the spin-lock problem I was
> > experiencing randomly on one of my systems in the past (see ML
> > archives).
>
> indeed,
On 15-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not
>> recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
>>
>> Anyone out there mind giving
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not
> recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
>
> Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a)
> recre
#554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it
here and the first guess seems to be wrong.
Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreate
it and b) give some insight into the problem.
13 matches
Mail list logo
