On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:48:00PM +0100, Olivier Roulet wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:02:25AM -0600, xOr wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Capdevila wrote:
> > > xOr wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enable lock modifiers".
>
>
> And anyway the ALT+click ( to raise a window ) is not handle by bbleys
> but directly by Blackbox. Changing a bbkeys setting
> will not change anything to your problem Am I wrong ?
>
you are correct. Setting the option will let bbkeys work with modifiers, but
has no effect on blackbo
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:02:25AM -0600, xOr wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Capdevila wrote:
> > xOr wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enable lock modifiers".
> > > > > ! set this to true if you want the old bbkeys behavior
> > > > > !
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Capdevila wrote:
> xOr wrote:
> >
> > > > > this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enable lock modifiers".
> > > > ! set this to true if you want the old bbkeys behavior
> > > > ! of not grabbbing keystrokes when caps/shift/num-locks are presse
xOr wrote:
>
> > > > this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enable lock modifiers".
> > > ! set this to true if you want the old bbkeys behavior
> > > ! of not grabbbing keystrokes when caps/shift/num-locks are pressed
> > > bbkeys.honorModifiers:False
> >
> > What exactly does this
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:12:08 -0600 xOr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:21:48PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > > Is there any way to keep this feature in future versions, but maybe with a
> > > less
> > > used modifier(Scroll Lock?) or even making it configurable with
On 04-Jan-2002 kadu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:17:34 -0800
> Lev Lvovsky wrote:
>> I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
>> far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible?
> I wrote a patch which enables both SloppyFocus + ClickToFocus.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:17:34 -0800
Lev Lvovsky wrote:
> I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
> far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible?
I wrote a patch which enables both SloppyFocus + ClickToFocus.
This patch will add new option on the rootm
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:21:48PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to keep this feature in future versions, but maybe with a
> > less
> > used modifier(Scroll Lock?) or even making it configurable with bbkeys?
> >
>
> this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enabl
>
> Is there any way to keep this feature in future versions, but maybe with a
> less
> used modifier(Scroll Lock?) or even making it configurable with bbkeys?
>
this is an option in bbkeys, something like "enable lock modifiers".
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 08:13:00 -0800 (PST)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03-Jan-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It never did make any sense to me why the lock keys should
> >> affect something like ALT+Click.
> Many of us even viewed it as
On 03-Jan-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It never did make any sense to me why the lock keys should
>> affect something like ALT+Click.
>
> Just to nitpick: It makes "sense" in so far as the WM does receive two
> different events (IIRC, I may be wrong here) de
scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It never did make any sense to me why the lock keys should
> affect something like ALT+Click.
Just to nitpick: It makes "sense" in so far as the WM does receive two
different events (IIRC, I may be wrong here) depending on whether one of
the lock keys is on or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 13:35, xOr wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:35:41PM +0100, M.G. Houtman wrote:
> >
> > Try Alt-Left Click with the NumLock turned off.
> >
> > Is there any way to make this work with num-lock turned ON btw? This cause
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:35:41PM +0100, M.G. Houtman wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2002 18:56, you wrote:
> > I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
> > far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
> > thinking:
> >
> > you have mul
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 18:56, you wrote:
> I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
> far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
> thinking:
>
> you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
> that's being
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 11:56, Lev Lvovsky wrote:
> you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
> that's being partially covered by another, you just move your mouse over
> to it...if however, you want to raise it, instead of clicking on the
> border, you just click anywh
I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
thinking:
you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
that's being partially covered by another, you just move your mouse ov
18 matches
Mail list logo
