If a person were to add --enable-compat185 and --enable-cxx to the build
in the testsuite phase, could the compiled db from the test phase be
salvaged for install or must it be wiped clean and re-compiled?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linu
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:33:23PM -0400, Yannick Bergeron wrote:
> about SSL/TLS Authentication and Postfix the patch could probably be
> removed since newer postfix versions have TLS built in
Please note that it's no longer "-DHAS_SSL". Now the macro is called
"-DUSE_TLS". See: http://www.postfi
about SSL/TLS Authentication and Postfix
the patch could probably be removed since newer postfix versions have TLS built
in
and cyrus-sasl-2.1.21 has been released
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the abov
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Or, simply place a note in the SVN instructions to remove the
build dir and apr-config file if you build against the SVN tree.
Still digging. The /usr/build dir should go, it is useless.
The apr-config could be cleaned up. I believe it has a purpose, though
few wil
David Jensen wrote these words on 07/03/05 10:20 CST:
> David Jensen wrote:
>
>>I have a spurious /usr/build directory on all my builds.
>>I appears to be apr build rules installed by Subversion.
>>If it is needed for something, it should be noted so.
>>/usr does not seem the right place for it in
David Jensen wrote:
I have a spurious /usr/build directory on all my builds.
I appears to be apr build rules installed by Subversion.
If it is needed for something, it should be noted so.
/usr does not seem the right place for it in any case.
anyone know whats up here?
I suppose everyone el
I have a spurious /usr/build directory on all my builds.
I appears to be apr build rules installed by Subversion.
If it is needed for something, it should be noted so.
/usr does not seem the right place for it in any case.
anyone know whats up here?
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.or
Andrew Benton wrote:
What do you mean by DOS line endings?
CRLF, instead of LF.
Also, shouldn't questions like this go to BLFS Support?
blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Of course, I've posted this same message, with a duplication recipe to
blfs-support. Apologies for not getting the rig
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hi folks.
http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#newline states that the
newline character is detected automatically, and an 'LF' should be
output for Linux/Unix systems. My tidied HTML files have DOS line
endings, but I'm running it (and compiled it) on a Linu
