Thank you all for your good wishes. I shall endeavour to limit the
damage I cause by, for instance, my tipografikal inexaktytudes.
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Is there any realistic expectation that the facility to write to the
lists via the NNTP service will be fixed? There is also a suggestion
that it might be withdrawn.
I ask, since I'm updating the text in the BLFS book, and I want to
accurately reflect the true situation. My current draft reads:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Please help me in welcoming Richard Downing (aka TheOldFellow) as a new
BLFS Editor. Richard has been contributing to the lists since 2002 and
will be a valuable asset to the BLFS Team.
I was a little early on blfs-book I guess. ;)
Again, nice to
DJ Lucas wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the
bug, but I don't see anything definitive.
I propose writing a dev.d handler instead of the start section of thecurrent
alsa bootscript, and adding text that i
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>>Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>>
>>>Hi:
>>>
>>>I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before
>>>releasing 6.1: *
>>>http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
>>
>>Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Please help me in welcoming Richard Downing (aka TheOldFellow) as a new
> BLFS Editor. Richard has been contributing to the lists since 2002 and
> will be a valuable asset to the BLFS Team.
>
> -- Bruce
Welcome Richard! :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
David Jensen wrote:
> KDE-3.4.2 is out, Bruce committed 3.4.1 yesterday! :-)
Damn!
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Please help me in welcoming Richard Downing (aka TheOldFellow) as a new
BLFS Editor. Richard has been contributing to the lists since 2002 and
will be a valuable asset to the BLFS Team.
-- Bruce
Sure, welcome aboard Richard!
Remember to keep a sense of humor, KDE-3.4.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Please help me in welcoming Richard Downing (aka TheOldFellow) as a new
BLFS Editor. Richard has been contributing to the lists since 2002 and
will be a valuable asset to the BLFS Team.
I was a little early on blfs-book I guess. ;)
Again, nice to see you with a bit more off
Please help me in welcoming Richard Downing (aka TheOldFellow) as a new
BLFS Editor. Richard has been contributing to the lists since 2002 and
will be a valuable asset to the BLFS Team.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
Just a heads up.
I will be going through BZ again tonight and re-examining the
outstanding bugs for the 6.1 release. When that is done, I anticipate a
package/bug freeze sometime tomorrow. After that, the only non-targeted
changes should be P1 (security) bugs. When all the targeted bugs are
f
On 7/28/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before releasing
> > 6.1:
> > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
> Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of sug
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote these words on 07/28/05 09:39 CST:
>
>
>>Anduin update is not in the Editor's Guide. Perhaps it should be added?
>
>
> Of course it should be added. In fact, I mentioned this a long time
> ago and Bruce said he would do it (as best as I can recall).
>
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/28/05 09:53 CST:
> Couple of questions:
> * Should the tarballs be bzipped only?
> * Should previous versions be deleted?
Yes and yes.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4]
On 7/28/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is primarily a note to the Editors, FYI for everyone else.
>
> There have been many package updates in the last couple of days,
> however very few updates to the package sources, patches and md5sums
> on Anduin.
>
> Let's d
TheOldFellow wrote these words on 07/28/05 09:39 CST:
> Anduin update is not in the Editor's Guide. Perhaps it should be added?
Of course it should be added. In fact, I mentioned this a long time
ago and Bruce said he would do it (as best as I can recall).
Apparently, it was overlooked.
No big
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is primarily a note to the Editors, FYI for everyone else.
>
> There have been many package updates in the last couple of days,
> however very few updates to the package sources, patches and md5sums
> on Anduin.
>
> Let's don't forget to keep Anduin up wi
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi all,
This is primarily a note to the Editors, FYI for everyone else.
There have been many package updates in the last couple of days,
however very few updates to the package sources, patches and md5sums
on Anduin.
Let's don't forget to keep Anduin up with the updates, else it becomes
a *very*
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before
>> releasing 6.1: *
>> http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
> Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the
> bug, but I don't s
20 matches
Mail list logo
