Test suite results

2006-04-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, I was messing around trying to see how easy it would be to count the number of passed tests from output of the GMP test suite. I'm updating the GMP package (GCC uses it, and I'm really updating GCC) and it is critical that all the tests pass. Here's what I came up with. As I've really

Re: Test suite results

2006-04-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/27/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/27/06 08:41 CST: echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \ awk '{print $2}' | \ sed s/.*/+amp;/`)) === All xx tests passed === Randy, what is

Re: Test suite results

2006-04-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/27/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \ awk '{print $2}' | \ sed s/.*/+amp;/`)) You can drop the sed by having the + be part of the awk print statement. $ grep 'tests passed' foo | awk '{print +$2}' +23 +19 -- Dan --

Re: Test suite results

2006-04-27 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \ awk '{print $2}' | \ sed s/.*/+amp;/`)) awk '/tests passed/{total+=$2} ; END{print total}' check.log -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: Test suite results

2006-04-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/27/06 09:34 CST: You can drop the sed by having the + be part of the awk print statement. Cool, thanks Dan. I've already updated the command in the book. I don't see how it can get any more condensed, so I'll commit it like this. Thanks again! -- Randy

Question about OpenOffice installation

2006-04-27 Thread Chris Staub
In the OOo instructions, BLFS says to install into /opt then create symlinks in /usr/lib so the OOo programs will be in your PATH. Other BLFS instructions for installing programs into /opt, like JDK and Apache-Ant, say to simply add /opt/PROGRAM_NAME/bin to the PATH. What's the difference in

Re: Question about OpenOffice installation

2006-04-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
Chris Staub wrote these words on 04/27/06 11:20 CST: Is this just showing different ways to use programs in /opt for educational value, or is there some technical reason for symlinking OOo progs in /usr/bin rather than adding /opt/openoffice-[version] to the path? I have no clue why it is

Re: Minor text updates for fluxbox and OOo

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Chris Staub wrote: Applied and committed. Thanks Chris. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: OpenSSL-0.9.8a

2006-04-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/11/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've opened a bug about the new version of OpenSSL (http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1838). snip I would like to ask those in the community if they have run packages against the new 0.9.8a version. Most importantly, I want

Re: OpenSSL-0.9.8a

2006-04-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 4/27/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be going out of town in about 5 hours, so please speak up soon. I want to get the update in before I leave. OK, here it comes. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Xorg and XFree86 post-installation configuration

2006-04-27 Thread DJ Lucas
In dividing the Xorg-7 instructions, I noticed (well I probably always knew it was close) that all three packages have almost the same post-install instructions. The exception is the installed program name called for creating the config file. Is there really any reason these three can't be

rp-pppoe

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Looking at ticket 1753, http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program. I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone on the list have a way to test it? -- Bruce --

Re: rp-pppoe

2006-04-27 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Looking at ticket 1753, http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program. I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone on the list have a way to test it?

Re: rp-pppoe

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Looking at ticket 1753, http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program. I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone on the

Re: Way Cool for BLFS!

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, There's a package that we have in BLFS, the Sysstat package, that has done something that is so cool. I personally think it to be one of the neatest open source things I've seen to date for me. For BLFS it would be considered just an average thing, I suppose.

Re: rp-pppoe

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Looking at the ppp wiki page, there is a reference to # The plugin comes from the ppp package # there's no need to install rp-pppoe plugin rp-pppoe.so If the plugin does indeed come from ppp, are you suggesting that we drop the rp-pppoe

Re: rp-pppoe

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I agree with your comment about explaining the pppoe connection setup by hand. I don't think I'm qualified to do that though because I have never used it. Are you saying to use the explanation in the ppp wiki page or something else? Yes.