Hi all,
I was messing around trying to see how easy it would be to count
the number of passed tests from output of the GMP test suite. I'm
updating the GMP package (GCC uses it, and I'm really updating GCC)
and it is critical that all the tests pass.
Here's what I came up with. As I've really
On 4/27/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/27/06 08:41 CST:
echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \
awk '{print $2}' | \
sed s/.*/+amp;/`))
===
All xx tests passed
===
Randy, what is
On 4/27/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \
awk '{print $2}' | \
sed s/.*/+amp;/`))
You can drop the sed by having the + be part of the awk print statement.
$ grep 'tests passed' foo | awk '{print +$2}'
+23
+19
--
Dan
--
Randy McMurchy wrote:
echo $((`grep 'tests passed' check.log | \
awk '{print $2}' | \
sed s/.*/+amp;/`))
awk '/tests passed/{total+=$2} ; END{print total}' check.log
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/27/06 09:34 CST:
You can drop the sed by having the + be part of the awk print statement.
Cool, thanks Dan. I've already updated the command in the book. I
don't see how it can get any more condensed, so I'll commit it like
this. Thanks again!
--
Randy
In the OOo instructions, BLFS says to install into /opt then create
symlinks in /usr/lib so the OOo programs will be in your PATH. Other
BLFS instructions for installing programs into /opt, like JDK and
Apache-Ant, say to simply add /opt/PROGRAM_NAME/bin to the PATH. What's
the difference in
Chris Staub wrote these words on 04/27/06 11:20 CST:
Is this just showing different
ways to use programs in /opt for educational value, or is there some
technical reason for symlinking OOo progs in /usr/bin rather than adding
/opt/openoffice-[version] to the path?
I have no clue why it is
Chris Staub wrote:
Applied and committed. Thanks Chris.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 3/11/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've opened a bug about the new version of OpenSSL
(http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1838).
snip
I would like to ask those in the community if they have run packages
against the new 0.9.8a version. Most importantly, I want
On 4/27/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be
going out of town in about 5 hours, so please speak up soon. I want
to get the update in before I leave.
OK, here it comes.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
In dividing the Xorg-7 instructions, I noticed (well I probably always
knew it was close) that all three packages have almost the same
post-install instructions. The exception is the installed program name
called for creating the config file. Is there really any reason these
three can't be
Looking at ticket 1753,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks
pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program.
I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone
on the list have a way to test it?
-- Bruce
--
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Looking at ticket 1753,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks
pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program.
I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone
on the list have a way to test it?
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Looking at ticket 1753,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/1753, the upgrade looks
pretty easy, but I do not have a PPPoE connection to test the program.
I can build and install the new version of the program, but does anyone
on the
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
There's a package that we have in BLFS, the Sysstat package, that has
done something that is so cool. I personally think it to be one of the
neatest open source things I've seen to date for me.
For BLFS it would be considered just an average thing, I suppose.
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Looking at the ppp wiki page, there is a reference to
# The plugin comes from the ppp package
# there's no need to install rp-pppoe
plugin rp-pppoe.so
If the plugin does indeed come from ppp, are you suggesting that we drop
the rp-pppoe
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I agree with your comment about explaining the pppoe connection setup by
hand. I don't think I'm qualified to do that though because I have
never used it. Are you saying to use the explanation in the ppp wiki
page or something else?
Yes.
17 matches
Mail list logo