Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Here is a preliminary version of the patch. Everyone with experience in
> kernel development is welcome to look before I submit this to LKML.
>
> The user-visible results of this patch are:
>
> * Reworded the description of CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT, because at some poin
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
2) make a kernel patch (only 11 added or changed lines) that makes this
setting available as a module parameter for nls_base.ko (thus also allowing
modification at runtime via sysfs) -
Do this. Even if they don't accept it, the issue is valid
On Thu, Mar 15, at 10:15 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> I will attach one ~/.zshrc and ~/.zprofile.
I need to add the attach word in the grep pattern, to cover some
more possibilities. :)
Here the files I promised.
#{{{ CREDITS
# Many thanks to (c) Michael Prokop <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Mar 15, at 10:20 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
> > > part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
> > > regardless.
> >
On 3/15/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, at 01:38 Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> > Noted that there was no mention about a test suite, so I added
> > a commented line as a reminder to do it. I didn't download the file
> > nor test the instructions, so I cannot determine
El Jueves, 15 de Marzo de 2007 20:52, Ag. Hatzimanikas escribió:
> Okey my last offer...
> I've finished 2 years of college, but I still have 2 more to do.
Then you have two more college years than I ;-)
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS
On Thu, Mar 15, at 02:39 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> > Oh and... about your question in your previous email:
> > I will wait until next morning to see if there are any objections
> > and then I will decide. In any case, I would like to be treated like a
> > student.
>
> I t
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> Oh and... about your question in your previous email:
> I will wait until next morning to see if there are any objections
> and then I will decide. In any case, I would like to be treated like a
> student.
I think graduate student would be appropriate.
-- Bruce
--
On Thu, Mar 15, at 01:38 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/15/07 12:09 CST:
> > I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks.
>
> Done.
Thanks Randy, I really appreciate it.
> Noted that there was no mention about a test suite, so I added
> a commented line as a reminder to do
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/15/07 12:09 CST:
> Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/15/07 06:39 CST:
>
>> Index: postlfs/shells/shells.xml
>> ===
>
> I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks.
Done. Noted that there was no me
On 3/15/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > +1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
> > part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
> > regardless.
>
> I don't have any objections to dropping ash for dash, but
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/15/07 06:39 CST:
> Index: postlfs/shells/shells.xml
> ===
I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks. In reference to Bruce's message,
I cannot see the need for ash any longer. We'll wait for the commu
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> +1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
> part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
> regardless.
I don't have any objections to dropping ash for dash, but I think that
should be Randy's call.
Personally, I don't use e
On Thu, Mar 15, at 07:15 Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> You read my mind :) To the point where I was reading the post and I
> couldn't tell if some parts had actually been written by me and were a
> forward. Even though I'd never actually written those things.
I am running a cronjob for Mind Rsync'ing'
On 3/15/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the rest.
> We are talking about dash, which is a standard POSIX shell, quite
> useful for debugging and very light/small shell that can be used in
> small systems.
>
> >From what I've read Dash (Debian's Ash) is maintained by Herbert
On 3/15/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So here it is, a little more than you expected. :)
You read my mind :) To the point where I was reading the post and I
couldn't tell if some parts had actually been written by me and were a
forward. Even though I'd never actually written
On Wed, Mar 14, at 02:46 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I keep bash around because I want the shell scripts to be portable, and sh
> > emulation in zsh
> > still is not perfect.
>
> If that's the only reason, then why not install a shell who
17 matches
Mail list logo
