On 09/12/11 12:58, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:53:30AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> - these are in the book and used everywhere:
> i.e. items 1 to 6 are used 'everywhere'
>>
>> 1. libxml2-2.7.8 => general
>>
>> 2. glib-2.30.1 => general
>>
>> 3. gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0 => genera
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:38:28 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> touch tools/edis/EnhancedDisassembly.exports
>> ./configure --prefix=/usr
>> find -name Makefile -exec\
>>sed -ir -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARE
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:53:30AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> - these are in the book and used everywhere:
i.e. items 1 to 6 are used 'everywhere'
>
> 1. libxml2-2.7.8 => general
>
> 2. glib-2.30.1 => general
>
> 3. gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0 => general, also used by gtk+-3
>
> 4. gtk+-2.24.8 =
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:27:24PM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a
> > completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3
> > packages. I agree with Andy that the
--- Em qui, 8/12/11, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: [blfs-dev] Firefox 8.0.1 (against Xulrunner)
> Para: "BLFS Development List"
> Data: Quinta-feira, 8 de Dezembro de 2011, 15:29
> Here, I needed more modifications
> from Andy's BLFS Firefox-8.0.1 page.
>
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 08/12/2011 05:42, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> There are two issues. Qt3 and qt4 have completely different libraries,
>> but their build tools, moc and qmake, have the same names. The easy
>> solution there is to put the desired executables first in PATH. After
>> the bui
Le 08/12/2011 03:30, DJ Lucas a écrit :
> I had actually intended to put Trinity into the book, but at the time,
> the cmake scripts were not quite ready for prime time.
I can't speak for the past. But now, at least, I think they are.
The stable version (3.5.13) uses cmake for the core packages
Le 08/12/2011 05:42, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> There are two issues. Qt3 and qt4 have completely different libraries,
> but their build tools, moc and qmake, have the same names. The easy
> solution there is to put the desired executables first in PATH. After
> the build is complete, then this
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> 1. I believe, in the hurry, a partial mozconfig text is in the book, because
> prefix is intended to be /usr, not /usr/local, as I found after first
> successful build. Thus,
>
> ac_add_options --prefix=/usr
Yes, you're rig
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> 1. A small typo in mozconfig:
> mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/firefox-build-dir
> but the command reads
> make -C xulrunner-build-dir install.
Thanks, I hadn't noticed.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
Here, I needed more modifications from Andy's BLFS Firefox-8.0.1 page.
Before proceeding, I would like to repeat how grateful I am to Andy, before his
pages, I was not able to build Xulrunner and Firefox against it, since the old
version 3 days, if I remember correctly.
1. I believe, in the hur
Due to what happened yesterday ([blfs-support] Firefox 8.0.1 upgraded ?) I
decided to reinstall Firefox against Xulrunner. This message is about the
xulrunner part. I tried to be as close as possible to Andrew Benton's BLFS
Xulrunner 8.0.1 page.
1. A small typo in mozconfig:
mk_add_options MOZ_
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a
>> completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3
>> packages. I agree with Andy that the pages should be marked. It's easy
>> enoug
13 matches
Mail list logo
